# Delineating Knowledge Boundaries for Honest Large Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26419 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26419/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 24 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10355/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00067/) (2019)
- [VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind People](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08218/) (2018)
- [ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07691/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14565/) (2023)
- [RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00849/) (2023)
- [Woodpecker: Hallucination Correction for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16045/) (2023)
- [Can Pre-trained Vision and Language Models Answer Visual Information-Seeking Questions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11713/) (2023)
- [R-Tuning: Instructing Large Language Models to Say `I Don't Know'](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09677/) (2023)
- [The Art of Saying No: Contextual Noncompliance in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12043/) (2024)
- [V-DPO: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Vision-Guided Direct Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.02712/) (2024)
- [The Wisdom of Hindsight Makes Language Models Better Instruction Followers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05206/) (2023)
- [Can AI Assistants Know What They Don't Know?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13275/) (2024)
- [CLIP-DPO: Vision-Language Models as a Source of Preference for Fixing Hallucinations in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.10433/) (2024)
- [Drawing the Line: Enhancing Trustworthiness of MLLMs Through the Power of Refusal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11196/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Uncertainty-Aware Decision Making in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17084/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable multimodal performance yet remain prone to factual hallucinations, particularly in long-tail or specialized domains. Moreover, current models exhibit a weak capacity to refuse queries that exceed their parametric knowledge. In this paper, we propose a systematic framework to enhance the refusal capability of VLMs when facing such unknown questions. We first curate a model-specific "Visual-Idk" (Visual-I don't know) dataset, leveraging multi-sample consistency probing to distinguish between known and unknown facts. We then align the model using supervised fine-tuning followed by preference-aware optimization (e.g., DPO, ORPO) to effectively delineate its knowledge boundaries. Results on the Visual-Idk dataset show our method improves the Truthful Rate from 57.9% to 67.3%. Additionally, internal probing also demonstrates that the model genuinely recognizes its boundaries instead of just memorizing refusal patterns. Our framework further generalizes to out-of-distribution medical and perceptual domains, providing a robust path toward more trustworthy and prudent visual assistants.