# Accelerating Quantum Materials Characterization: Hybrid Active Learning for Autonomous Spin Wave Spectroscopy

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23821 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.23821/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 2 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Autonomous synthesis of metastable materials](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.07385/) (2021)
- [Active learning-assisted neutron spectroscopy with log-Gaussian processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.00980/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous neutron spectroscopy must solve three distinct tasks: detection (where is the signal?), inference (which Hamiltonian governs it?), and refinement (what are the parameters?). No single controller solves all three equally well. We present TAS-AI, a hybrid agnostic-to-physics-informed framework for autonomous triple-axis spin-wave spectroscopy that separates these tasks explicitly. In blind reconstruction benchmarks, model-agnostic methods such as random sampling, coarse grids, and Gaussian-process mappers reach a global error threshold more reliably and with fewer measurements than physics-informed planning, supporting the claim that discovery and inference are distinct tasks requiring distinct controllers. Once signal structure is localized, the physics-informed stage performs in-loop Hamiltonian discrimination and parameter refinement: in a controlled square-lattice test between nearest-neighbor-only and J1-J2 Hamiltonians, TAS-AI reaches a decisive AIC-derived evidence ratio (>100) in fewer than 10 measurements, while motion-aware scheduling cuts wall-clock time by 32% at a fixed measurement budget. We also identify a failure mode of posterior-weighted design, algorithmic myopia, in which the planner over-refines the current leading model while under-sampling low-intensity falsification probes. A constrained falsification channel sharply reduces time spent committed to the wrong model and accelerates correct model selection without modifying the Bayesian inference engine. In controlled two-model ablations, both a deterministic top-two max-disagreement rule and an LLM-based audit committee achieve this gain under identical constraints. We demonstrate the full workflow in silico using a high-fidelity digital twin and provide an open-source Python implementation.