# LegalDrill: Diagnosis-Driven Synthesis for Legal Reasoning in Small Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23809 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.23809/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 33 of its 62 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20783/) (2025)
- [OpenAI o1 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16720/) (2024)
- [Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17746/) (2025)
- [AdaLoRA: Adaptive Budget Allocation for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.10512/) (2023)
- [Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03373/) (2025)
- [Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04792/) (2024)
- [OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07743/) (2025)
- [Chatlaw: A Multi-Agent Legal Assistant based on a Role-Aligned Mixture-of-Experts Architecture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16092/) (2023)
- [DISC-LawLLM: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Intelligent Legal Services](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11325/) (2023)
- [Small Models Struggle to Learn from Strong Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12143/) (2025)
- [Small Language Models: Survey, Measurements, and Insights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15790/) (2024)
- [LEXam: Benchmarking Legal Reasoning on 340 Law Exams](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12864/) (2025)
- [Alternating Reinforcement Learning for Rubric-Based Reward Modeling in Non-Verifiable LLM Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01511/) (2026)
- [Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09241/) (2023)
- [Adapting Large Language Models to Domains via Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.09530/) (2023)
- [Understanding Aha Moments: from External Observations to Internal Mechanisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02956/) (2025)
- [A Survey of Process Reward Models: From Outcome Signals to Process Supervisions for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08049/) (2025)
- [Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Iterative DPO: A Comprehensive Empirical Investigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12854/) (2025)
- [LawGPT: A Chinese Legal Knowledge-Enhanced Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04614/) (2024)
- [Let the Expert Stick to His Last: Expert-Specialized Fine-Tuning for Sparse Architectural Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01906/) (2024)
- [Can Pruning Improve Reasoning? Revisiting Long-CoT Compression with Capability in Mind for Better Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14582/) (2025)
- [Guiding Reasoning in Small Language Models with LLM Assistance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09923/) (2025)
- [Flow-DPO: Improving LLM Mathematical Reasoning through Online Multi-Agent Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22304/) (2024)
- [LegalDelta: Enhancing Legal Reasoning in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Thought Guided Information Gain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.12281/) (2025)
- [Benchmarking Multi-Step Legal Reasoning and Analyzing Chain-of-Thought Effects in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07979/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Small language models (SLMs) are promising for real-world deployment due to their efficiency and low operational cost. However, their limited capacity struggles with high-stakes legal reasoning tasks that require coherent statute interpretation and logically consistent deduction. Furthermore, training SLMs for such tasks demands high-quality, concise reasoning trajectories, which are prohibitively expensive to manually collect and difficult to curate via standard rejection sampling, lacking granularity beyond final verdicts. To address these challenges, we propose {LegalDrill}, a diagnosis-driven synthesis framework that extracts and iteratively refines reasoning trajectories from a capable teacher via fine-grained prompting, then a self-reflective verification is employed to adaptively select the most effective data for the SLM student. The resulting data empower SLM training through supervised fine-tuning and direct preference optimization. Extensive experiments on several legal benchmarks demonstrate that {LegalDrill} significantly bolsters the legal reasoning capabilities of representative SLMs while bypassing the need for scarce expert annotations, paving a scalable path toward practical legal reasoning systems.