# Small Language Model Helps Resolve Semantic Ambiguity of LLM Prompt

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23263 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.23263/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 34 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17453/) (2023)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04388/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01910/) (2022)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04118/) (2020)
- [What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04341/) (2019)
- [AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06364/) (2023)
- [Attention is not not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04626/) (2019)
- [Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16797/) (2023)
- [AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10645/) (2020)
- ["Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.00648/) (2017)
- [Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliable](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09150/) (2022)
- [PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16427/) (2023)
- [Take a Step Back: Evoking Reasoning via Abstraction in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06117/) (2023)
- [On the Origin of Hallucinations in Conversational Models: Is it the Datasets or the Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.07931/) (2022)
- [Rephrase and Respond: Let Large Language Models Ask Better Questions for Themselves](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04205/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Commonsense in Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11931/) (2019)
- [PiVe: Prompting with Iterative Verification Improving Graph-based Generative Capability of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12392/) (2023)
- [Self-Supervised Prompt Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06855/) (2025)
- [Think-While-Generating: On-the-Fly Reasoning for Personalized Long-Form Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.06690/) (2025)
- [PREFER: Prompt Ensemble Learning via Feedback-Reflect-Refine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12033/) (2023)
- [Look Inward to Explore Outward: Learning Temperature Policy from LLM Internal States via Hierarchical RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13035/) (2026)
- [Dipper: Diversity in Prompts for Producing Large Language Model Ensembles in Reasoning tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15238/) (2024)
- [Interactive-Chain-Prompting: Ambiguity Resolution for Crosslingual Conditional Generation with Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10309/) (2023)
- [Zero and Few-shot Semantic Parsing with Ambiguous Inputs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00824/) (2023)
- [Clarifying Ambiguities: on the Role of Ambiguity Types in Prompting Methods for Clarification Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12113/) (2025)
- [When Right Meets Wrong: Bilateral Context Conditioning with Reward-Confidence Correction for GRPO](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.13134/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in various complex reasoning tasks due to their excellent instruction following capability. However, the model's performance is highly dependent on the open-ended characteristics of the users' input prompt. Natural prompts often do not follow proper syntactic rules, which creates ambiguous queries that yield multiple interpretations. Such ambiguous prompts confuse the model in choosing the correct reasoning paths to answer questions. Prior works address this challenge by applying query editing during the LLM inference process without explicitly solving the root cause of the ambiguity. To address this limitation, we propose a pre-inference prompt optimization mechanism via explicit prompt disambiguation. Particularly, we identify semantic risks in the prompt, check their multi-perspective consistency, and resolve any semantic conflicts that arise. Finally, we organize the resolved ambiguities in a logically structured manner as a clean input to the LLM. By explicitly resolving semantic ambiguity, our method can produce a more focused attention distribution to the semantically essential tokens. We also leverage small language models (SLMs) as the main executor of prompt disambiguation to benefit from their efficient computation. Through comprehensive experiments on multiple benchmarks, we demonstrate that our method improves reasoning performance by 2.5 points at a cost of only 0.02. Our study promotes explicit prompt disambiguation as an effective prompt optimization method without disturbing the internal mechanism of LLM inference.