# Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23080 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.23080/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 1 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [The AGNTCY Agent Directory Service: Architecture and Implementation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18787/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale agentic systems run on distributed infrastructures where many software agents share physical hosts and are discovered via peer-to-peer mechanisms. Discovery must handle node-level churn from failures and host departures and agent-level churn from demand-driven activation, deactivation, and state changes. Their interaction reshapes classic trade-offs between structured and unstructured overlays. We study decentralized agent discovery under this two-level churn, assuming nodes host multiple agents, overlays are structured or gossip-based, and agents switch between warm and cold states. Using Kademlia as a structured and Cyclon+Vicinity as a gossip baseline, we compare stable, node-churn-only, agent-cooling-only, and combined regimes to see when routing efficiency, resilience, and service readiness align or favor different designs. Structured overlays are more robust and efficient in stable and node-churn regimes, while gossip-based overlays remain competitive and can be faster when readiness dominates.