# SwarmDrive: Semantic V2V Coordination for Latency-Constrained Cooperative Autonomous Driving

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22852 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.22852/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Cooperative and V2X driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving.
- Builds on 18 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- End-to-end autonomous driving / [Cooperative and V2X driving](https://mlsanity.com/driving/cooperative-and-v2x-driving/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DriveGPT4: Interpretable End-to-end Autonomous Driving via Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01412/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.05113/) (2019)
- [V2X-ViT: Vehicle-to-Everything Cooperative Perception with Vision Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10638/) (2022)
- [OPV2V: An Open Benchmark Dataset and Fusion Pipeline for Perception with Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07644/) (2021)
- [Where2comm: Communication-Efficient Collaborative Perception via Spatial Confidence Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.12836/) (2022)
- [DriveMLM: Aligning Multi-Modal Large Language Models with Behavioral Planning States for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09245/) (2023)
- [Driving with LLMs: Fusing Object-Level Vector Modality for Explainable Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01957/) (2023)
- [DiLu: A Knowledge-Driven Approach to Autonomous Driving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16292/) (2023)
- [Drive as You Speak: Enabling Human-Like Interaction with Large Language Models in Autonomous Vehicles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10228/) (2023)
- [V2V-LLM: Vehicle-to-Vehicle Cooperative Autonomous Driving with Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09980/) (2025)
- [Multi-Agent Autonomous Driving Systems with Large Language Models: A Survey of Recent Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16804/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Thought for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Survey and Future Prospects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20223/) (2025)
- [LLM4AD: Large Language Models for Autonomous Driving -- Concept, Review, Benchmark, Experiments, and Future Trends](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15281/) (2024)
- [Methodologies of Link-Level Simulator and System-Level Simulator for C-V2X Communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.04693/) (2019)
- [Effect of Retransmissions on the Performance of C-V2X Communication for 5G](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08822/) (2020)
- [Evaluating the Impact of Numerology and Retransmission on 5G NR V2X Communication at A System-Level Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14158/) (2023)
- [A Survey on the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in 6G-V2X Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09512/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Cloud-hosted LLM inference for autonomous driving adds round-trip delay and depends on stable connectivity, while purely local edge models struggle under occlusion. We present SwarmDrive, a semantic Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) coordination framework in which nearby vehicles run local Small Language Models (SLMs), share compact intent distributions only when uncertainty is high, and fuse them through event-triggered consensus. We evaluate SwarmDrive in a 5-seed executable study built around one occluded intersection case, combining matched operating-point comparisons with robustness sweeps. In that setting, SwarmDrive under its 6G communication setting ("Swarm 6G") raises success from 68.9% to 94.1% over a single local SLM while reducing latency from a 510 ms cloud reference to 151.4 ms. However, an increased number of participating vehicles leads to higher communication overhead and packet loss. SwarmDrive also evaluates the impact of swarm-size, packet-loss, and entropy-threshold sweeps and shows that the cooperative gain holds across ablations and is best balanced near an active swarm size of 4 vehicles and an entropy trigger threshold of 0.65 in the current prototype. These results show that semantic edge cooperation can work under tight latency constraints in the targeted intersection case, but they are not a deployment-grade validation of a real 6G stack.