# Grounding Video Reasoning in Physical Signals

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21873 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21873/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05499/) (2023)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.21075/) (2024)
- [Video-LLaVA: Learning United Visual Representation by Alignment Before Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10122/) (2023)
- [MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17005/) (2023)
- [The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sense](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04261/) (2017)
- [Video-ChatGPT: Towards Detailed Video Understanding via Large Vision and Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05424/) (2023)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04118/) (2020)
- [Dense-Captioning Events in Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.00754/) (2017)
- [LongVideoBench: A Benchmark for Long-context Interleaved Video-Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15754/) (2024)
- [Towards Automatic Learning of Procedures from Web Instructional Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.09788/) (2017)
- [TALL: Temporal Activity Localization via Language Query](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.02101/) (2017)
- [Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03162/) (2022)
- [VideoLLaMA 3: Frontier Multimodal Foundation Models for Image and Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13106/) (2025)
- [CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01442/) (2019)
- [InternVideo2.5: Empowering Video MLLMs with Long and Rich Context Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12386/) (2025)
- [Revisiting the "Video" in Video-Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01720/) (2022)
- [HoloAssist: an Egocentric Human Interaction Dataset for Interactive AI Assistants in the Real World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17024/) (2023)
- [PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.16411/) (2025)
- [TVQA+: Spatio-Temporal Grounding for Video Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.11574/) (2019)
- [Molmo2: Open Weights and Data for Vision-Language Models with Video Understanding and Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.10611/) (2026)
- [Can I Trust Your Answer? Visually Grounded Video Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.01327/) (2023)
- [Where Does It Exist: Spatio-Temporal Video Grounding for Multi-Form Sentences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.06891/) (2020)
- [V-STaR: Benchmarking Video-LLMs on Video Spatio-Temporal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11495/) (2025)
- [Test of Time: Instilling Video-Language Models with a Sense of Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.02074/) (2023)
- [TAU-R1: Visual Language Model for Traffic Anomaly Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19098/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [APT: Atomic Physical Transitions for Causal Video-Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.18586/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Physical video understanding requires more than naming an event correctly. A model can answer a question about pouring, sliding, or collision from textual regularities while still failing to localize the event in time or space. We introduce a grounded benchmark for physical video understanding that extends the what--when--where evaluation structure of V-STaR to four video sources, six physics domains, three prompt families (physics, vstar_like, and neutral_rstr), and four input conditions (original, shuffled, ablated, and frame-masked). The benchmark contains 1,560 base video clips from SSV2, YouCook2, HoloAssist, and Roundabout-TAU. Each clip is first converted into a shared grounded event record, and the three query families are derived from that record. Temporal and spatial targets are shared across prompt families, while the non-physics families use deterministic family-appropriate semantic a_what targets derived from the same record. Across models and prompt families, physics remains the strongest regime overall, vstar_like is the clearest non-physics semantic comparison, and neutral_rstr behaves as a harder templated control. Prompt-family robustness is selective rather than universal, perturbation gains cluster in weak original cases, and spatial grounding is the weakest across settings. These results suggest that video Q&A reasoning benchmarks shall report physically grounded, prompt-aware, and perturbation-aware diagnostics alongside aggregate accuracy.