# Generalizing Numerical Reasoning in Table Data through Operation Sketches and Self-Supervised Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21495 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21495/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12588/) (2022)
- [OpenAI GPT-5 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03267/) (2025)
- [DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.00161/) (2019)
- [MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13319/) (2019)
- [FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00122/) (2021)
- [TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.02349/) (2020)
- [TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Finance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07624/) (2021)
- [TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.08314/) (2020)
- [HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07347/) (2020)
- [Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03439/) (2023)
- [ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03849/) (2022)
- [Injecting Numerical Reasoning Skills into Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04487/) (2020)
- [MultiHiertt: Numerical Reasoning over Multi Hierarchical Tabular and Textual Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01347/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are few(1)-shot Table Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06710/) (2022)
- [NumNet: Machine Reading Comprehension with Numerical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.06701/) (2019)
- [ELASTIC: Numerical Reasoning with Adaptive Symbolic Compiler](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10105/) (2022)
- [Augment before You Try: Knowledge-Enhanced Table Question Answering via Table Expansion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.15555/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Numerical reasoning over expert-domain tables often exhibits high in-domain accuracy but limited robustness to domain shift. Models trained with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on specific datasets tend to rely on header-operation shortcuts rather than structural reasoning. We introduce TaNOS, a continual pre-training framework comprising three components: (i) header anonymization to reduce lexical memorization, (ii) operation sketches that provide minimal structural cues, and (iii) self-supervised pretraining that constructs correctness-guaranteed program-question pairs from given tables in a program-first manner. By decoupling domain semantics and numerical operation structure, TaNOS improves the transferability of numerical reasoning. Applied to an 8B instruction-tuned model, TaNOS achieves 80.13% execution accuracy on FinQA with only 10% train data, outperforming SFT baseline (73.97%) with full train data and proprietary models such as GPT-5, Gemini-2.5-Pro. Furthermore, in the domain-shift experiments, TaNOS displays nearly-negligible cross-domain gap (<2pp) when standard SFT shows over 10pp gap. These results suggest that structural guidance with operation sketches, header-agnostic representations, and correctness-guaranteed self-supervision can improve the robustness of numerical reasoning across diverse expert-domain tables.