# FairQE: Multi-Agent Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias in Translation Quality Estimation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21420 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21420/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Social simulation and multi-agent debate](https://mlsanity.com/agents/social-simulation-and-multi-agent-debate/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.09025/) (2020)
- [Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14478/) (2021)
- [Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10669/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08976/) (2019)
- [CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06243/) (2022)
- [GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13988/) (2023)
- [Gender Bias in Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06001/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.14168/) (2021)
- [Scaling up COMETKIWI: Unbabel-IST 2023 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11925/) (2023)
- [MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01355/) (2022)
- [Physician Detection of Clinical Harm in Machine Translation: Quality Estimation Aids in Reliance and Backtranslation Identifies Critical Errors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16924/) (2023)
- [There's no Data Like Better Data: Using QE Metrics for MT Data Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05350/) (2023)
- [GATE: A Challenge Set for Gender-Ambiguous Translation Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03975/) (2023)
- [What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.00545/) (2024)
- [Mind the Inclusivity Gap: Multilingual Gender-Neutral Translation Evaluation with mGeNTE](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09409/) (2025)
- [Watching the Watchers: Exposing Gender Disparities in Machine Translation Quality Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10995/) (2024)
- [GAMBIT+: A Challenge Set for Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translation Quality Estimation Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06841/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Benchmarking Gender Bias in Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics across Occupations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.21490/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Quality Estimation (QE) aims to assess machine translation quality without reference translations, but recent studies have shown that existing QE models exhibit systematic gender bias. In particular, they tend to favor masculine realizations in gender-ambiguous contexts and may assign higher scores to gender-misaligned translations even when gender is explicitly specified. To address these issues, we propose FairQE, a multi-agent-based, fairness-aware QE framework that mitigates gender bias in both gender-ambiguous and gender-explicit scenarios. FairQE detects gender cues, generates gender-flipped translation variants, and combines conventional QE scores with LLM-based bias-mitigating reasoning through a dynamic bias-aware aggregation mechanism. This design preserves the strengths of existing QE models while calibrating their gender-related biases in a plug-and-play manner. Extensive experiments across multiple gender bias evaluation settings demonstrate that FairQE consistently improves gender fairness over strong QE baselines. Moreover, under MQM-based meta-evaluation following the WMT 2023 Metrics Shared Task, FairQE achieves competitive or improved general QE performance. These results show that gender bias in QE can be effectively mitigated without sacrificing evaluation accuracy, enabling fairer and more reliable translation evaluation.