# CyberCertBench: Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Certification Knowledge

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20389 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.20389/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03218/) (2024)
- [Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.15000/) (2022)
- [On Hallucination and Predictive Uncertainty in Conditional Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.15025/) (2021)
- [Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08926/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13793/) (2024)
- [AutoAttacker: A Large Language Model Guided System to Implement Automatic Cyber-attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01038/) (2024)
- [NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05590/) (2024)
- [CyberSecEval 2: A Wide-Ranging Cybersecurity Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13161/) (2024)
- [CTIBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07599/) (2024)
- [CYBERSECEVAL 3: Advancing the Evaluation of Cybersecurity Risks and Capabilities in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01605/) (2024)
- [CyberMetric: A Benchmark Dataset based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07688/) (2024)
- [Describing Differences between Text Distributions with Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12323/) (2022)
- [SecQA: A Concise Question-Answering Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Computer Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15838/) (2023)
- [An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs for Solving Offensive Security Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11814/) (2024)
- [Beyond Code Generation: An Observational Study of ChatGPT Usage in Software Engineering Practice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14901/) (2024)
- [Using Large Language Models for Cybersecurity Capture-The-Flag Challenges and Certification Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10443/) (2023)
- [A Framework for Evaluating Emerging Cyberattack Capabilities of AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11917/) (2025)
- [Catastrophic Cyber Capabilities Benchmark (3CB): Robustly Evaluating LLM Agent Cyber Offense Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09114/) (2024)
- [OCCULT: Evaluating Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Operation Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15797/) (2025)
- [U-shaped and Inverted-U Scaling behind Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01692/) (2024)
- [Cyber-Physical Energy Systems Security: Threat Modeling, Risk Assessment, Resources, Metrics, and Case Studies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.10198/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [CESBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Cryptographic Engineering Security for IoT Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.21344/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid evolution and use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in professional workflows require an evaluation of their domain-specific knowledge against industry standards. We introduceCyberCertBench, a new suite of Multiple Choice Question Answering (MCQA) benchmarks derived from industry recognized certifications. CyberCertBench evaluates LLM domain knowledgeagainst the professional standards of Information Technology cybersecurity and more specializedareas such as Operational Technology and related cybersecurity standards. Concurrently, we propose and validate a novel Proposer-Verifier framework, a methodology to generate interpretable,natural language explanations for model performance. Our evaluation shows that frontier modelsachieve human expert level in general networking and IT security knowledge. However, theiraccuracy declines in questions that require vendor-specific nuances or knowledge in formalstandards, like, e.g., IEC 62443. Analysis of model scaling trend and release date demonstratesremarkable gains in parameter efficiency, while recent larger models show diminishing returns.Code and evaluation scripts are available at: https://github.com/GKeppler/CyberCertBench.