# Towards High-Quality Machine Translation for Kokborok: A Low-Resource Tibeto-Burman Language of Northeast India

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19778 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.19778/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08771/) (2018)
- [No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.04672/) (2022)
- [COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.09025/) (2020)
- [Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06709/) (2015)
- [Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01852/) (2020)
- [SMOL: Professionally translated parallel data for 115 under-represented languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12301/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present KokborokMT, a high-quality neural machine translation (NMT) system for Kokborok (ISO 639-3), a Tibeto-Burman language spoken primarily in Tripura, India with approximately 1.5 million speakers. Despite its status as an official language of Tripura, Kokborok has remained severely under-resourced in the NLP community, with prior machine translation attempts limited to systems trained on small Bible-derived corpora achieving BLEU scores below 7. We fine-tune the NLLB-200-distilled-600M model on a multi-source parallel corpus comprising 36,052 sentence pairs: 9,284 professionally translated sentences from the SMOL dataset, 1,769 Bible-domain sentences from WMT shared task data, and 24,999 synthetic back-translated pairs generated via Gemini Flash from Tatoeba English source sentences. We introduce as a new language token for Kokborok in the NLLB framework. Our best system achieves BLEU scores of 17.30 and 38.56 on held-out test sets, representing substantial improvements over prior published results. Human evaluation by three annotators yields mean adequacy of 3.74/5 and fluency of 3.70/5, with substantial agreement between trained evaluators.