# From Actions to Understanding: Conformal Interpretability of Temporal Concepts in LLM Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19775 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.19775/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 36 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)
- Mechanistic interpretability / [Knowledge and representations inside LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mechinterp/knowledge-and-representations-inside-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09332/) (2021)
- [Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08600/) (2023)
- [Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01644/) (2016)
- [Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01405/) (2023)
- [ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03768/) (2020)
- [Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05608/) (2022)
- [BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05950/) (2019)
- [ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01734/) (2019)
- [What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.01070/) (2018)
- [Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02716/) (2024)
- [A Simple Language Model for Task-Oriented Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00796/) (2020)
- [Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13379/) (2023)
- [The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02547/) (2025)
- [Aligning Cyber Space with Physical World: A Comprehensive Survey on Embodied AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06886/) (2024)
- [Can Large Language Models Explain Themselves? A Study of LLM-Generated Self-Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11207/) (2023)
- [Watch Every Step! LLM Agent Learning via Iterative Step-Level Process Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11176/) (2024)
- [Real-time Out-of-distribution Detection in Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.10494/) (2020)
- [Towards Understanding In-Context Learning with Contrastive Demonstrations and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.05052/) (2023)
- [Toward universal steering and monitoring of AI models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03708/) (2025)
- [iDECODe: In-distribution Equivariance for Conformal Out-of-distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.02331/) (2022)
- [Analyzing Uncertainty of LLM-as-a-Judge: Interval Evaluations with Conformal Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18658/) (2025)
- [RICL: Adding In-Context Adaptability to Pre-Trained Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02062/) (2025)
- [Can Slow-thinking LLMs Reason Over Time? Empirical Studies in Time Series Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24511/) (2025)
- [Prune 'n Predict: Optimizing LLM Decision-making with Conformal Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00555/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Doomed from the Start: Early Abort of LLM Agent Episodes via a Recall-Controlled Probe Cascade](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.06503/) (2026)
- [Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.07395/) (2026)
- [Safety Signals to Verify NetOps Agents with Action-Level Granularity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14422/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents capable of reasoning, planning, and acting within interactive environments. Despite their growing capability to perform multi-step reasoning and decision-making tasks, internal mechanisms guiding their sequential behavior remain opaque. This paper presents a framework for interpreting the temporal evolution of concepts in LLM agents through a step-wise conformal lens. We introduce the conformal interpretability framework for temporal tasks, which combines step-wise reward modeling with conformal prediction to statistically label model's internal representation at each step as successful or failing. Linear probes are then trained on these representations to identify directions of temporal concepts - latent directions in the model's activation space that correspond to consistent notions of success, failure or reasoning drift. Experimental results on two simulated interactive environments, namely ScienceWorld and AlfWorld, demonstrate that these temporal concepts are linearly separable, revealing interpretable structures aligned with task success. We further show preliminary results on improving an LLM agent's performance by leveraging the proposed framework for steering the identified successful directions inside the model. The proposed approach, thus, offers a principled method for early failure detection as well as intervention in LLM-based agents, paving the path towards trustworthy autonomous language models in complex interactive settings.