# Unveiling Fine-Grained Visual Traces: Evaluating Multimodal Interleaved Reasoning Chains in Multimodal STEM Tasks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19697 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.19697/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 44 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 44)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04388/) (2023)
- [Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14683/) (2025)
- [Janus-Pro: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation with Data and Model Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17811/) (2025)
- [Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00928/) (2020)
- [MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14624/) (2024)
- [Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01535/) (2024)
- [JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17631/) (2023)
- [R1-VL: Learning to Reason with Multimodal Large Language Models via Step-wise Group Relative Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12937/) (2025)
- [Visual Sketchpad: Sketching as a Visual Chain of Thought for Multimodal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09403/) (2024)
- [Show-o2: Improved Native Unified Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15564/) (2025)
- [Thinking with Images for Multimodal Reasoning: Foundations, Methods, and Future Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23918/) (2025)
- [Multimodal ArXiv: A Dataset for Improving Scientific Comprehension of Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00231/) (2024)
- [Emu3.5: Native Multimodal Models are World Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.26583/) (2025)
- [Zebra-CoT: A Dataset for Interleaved Vision Language Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16746/) (2025)
- [Thinking with Generated Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22525/) (2025)
- [Visual Chain of Thought: Bridging Logical Gaps with Multimodal Infillings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02317/) (2023)
- [ThinkMorph: Emergent Properties in Multimodal Interleaved Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.27492/) (2025)
- [LongCat-Next: Lexicalizing Modalities as Discrete Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.27538/) (2026)
- [MathCanvas: Intrinsic Visual Chain-of-Thought for Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14958/) (2025)
- [Easier Painting Than Thinking: Can Text-to-Image Models Set the Stage, but Not Direct the Play?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.03516/) (2025)
- [RealUnify: Do Unified Models Truly Benefit from Unification? A Comprehensive Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24897/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Beyond the Last Layer: Multi-Layer Representation Fusion for Visual Tokenization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10780/) (2026)
- [SnapBench: Benchmarking Snap-and-Ask Multimodal Retrieval for Mobile Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29607/) (2026)
- [Learning Multimodal Embeddings with Evidence-Aligned Readout](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33659/) (2026)
- [InterTab: Interleaved Visual-Structure Alignment for Multi-Modal Table Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32660/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown promising reasoning abilities, yet evaluating their performance in specialized domains remains challenging. STEM reasoning is a particularly valuable testbed because it provides highly verifiable feedback, but existing benchmarks often permit unimodal shortcuts due to modality redundancy and focus mainly on final-answer accuracy, overlooking the reasoning process itself. To address this challenge, we introduce StepSTEM: a graduate-level benchmark of 283 problems across mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, and engineering for fine-grained evaluation of cross-modal reasoning in MLLMs. StepSTEM is constructed through a rigorous curation pipeline that enforces strict complementarity between textual and visual inputs. We further propose a general step-level evaluation framework for both text-only chain-of-thought and interleaved image-text reasoning, using dynamic programming to align predicted reasoning steps with multiple reference solutions. Experiments across a wide range of models show that current MLLMs still rely heavily on textual reasoning, with even Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Opus 4.6 achieving only 38.29% accuracy. These results highlight substantial headroom for genuine cross-modal STEM reasoning and position StepSTEM as a benchmark for fine-grained evaluation of multimodal reasoning. Source code is available at https://github.com/lll-hhh/STEPSTEM.