# PREF-XAI: Preference-Based Personalized Rule Explanations of Black-Box Machine Learning Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19684 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.19684/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04388/) (2023)
- [A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01933/) (2018)
- [Local Rule-Based Explanations of Black Box Decision Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.10820/) (2018)
- [Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.01644/) (2015)
- [Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13076/) (2021)
- [Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06420/) (2021)
- [LLMs Don't Know Their Own Decision Boundaries: The Unreliability of Self-Generated Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.09396/) (2025)
- [Towards consistency of rule-based explainer and black box model -- fusion of rule induction and XAI-based feature importance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14543/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has predominantly focused on generating model-centric explanations that approximate the behavior of black-box models. However, such explanations often overlook a fundamental aspect of interpretability: different users require different explanations depending on their goals, preferences, and cognitive constraints. Although recent work has explored user-centric and personalized explanations, most existing approaches rely on heuristic adaptations or implicit user modeling, lacking a principled framework for representing and learning individual preferences. In this paper, we consider Preference-Based Explainable Artificial Intelligence (PREF-XAI), a novel perspective that reframes explanation as a preference-driven decision problem. Within PREF-XAI, explanations are not treated as fixed outputs, but as alternatives to be evaluated and selected according to user-specific criteria. In the PREF-XAI perspective, here we propose a methodology that combines rule-based explanations with formal preference learning. User preferences are elicited through a ranking of a small set of candidate explanations and modeled via an additive utility function inferred using robust ordinal regression. Experimental results on real-world datasets show that PREF-XAI can accurately reconstruct user preferences from limited feedback, identify highly relevant explanations, and discover novel explanatory rules not initially considered by the user. Beyond the proposed methodology, this work establishes a connection between XAI and preference learning, opening new directions for interactive and adaptive explanation systems.