# SimDiff: Depth Pruning via Similarity and Difference

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19520 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.19520/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11641/) (2019)
- [BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10044/) (2019)
- [Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02789/) (2018)
- [SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00774/) (2023)
- [RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.04683/) (2017)
- [CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.07042/) (2018)
- [MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13319/) (2019)
- [LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11627/) (2023)
- [CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinese](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09212/) (2023)
- [SliceGPT: Compress Large Language Models by Deleting Rows and Columns](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.15024/) (2024)
- [ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expect](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03853/) (2024)
- [XL-Sum: Large-Scale Multilingual Abstractive Summarization for 44 Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.13822/) (2021)
- [Outlier Weighed Layerwise Sparsity (OWL): A Missing Secret Sauce for Pruning LLMs to High Sparsity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05175/) (2023)
- [LaCo: Large Language Model Pruning via Layer Collapse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11187/) (2024)
- [SLEB: Streamlining LLMs through Redundancy Verification and Elimination of Transformer Blocks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09025/) (2024)
- [Shortened LLaMA: Depth Pruning for Large Language Models with Comparison of Retraining Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02834/) (2024)
- [Investigating Prior Knowledge for Challenging Chinese Machine Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09679/) (2019)
- [A Systematic Classification of Knowledge, Reasoning, and Context within the ARC Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00358/) (2018)
- [The Emergence of Essential Sparsity in Large Pre-trained Models: The Weights that Matter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03805/) (2023)
- [DLP: Dynamic Layerwise Pruning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23807/) (2025)
- [Entropy-Based Block Pruning for Efficient Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.03794/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [From General Actions to Domain-Specific Monitoring: Prior-Adaptive Transfer for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.03327/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Depth pruning improves the deployment efficiency of large language models (LLMs) by identifying and removing redundant layers. A widely accepted standard for this identification process is to measure the similarity between layers using cosine distance. However, we find that methods relying solely on this one-dimensional heuristic can exhibit unpredictable performance and even catastrophic collapse across different architectures. To address this issue, we propose SimDiff, a novel layer importance criterion that jointly evaluates layers from two orthogonal perspectives: representational similarity and transformation difference. The difference is quantified using two distinct metrics: MSSD, which is sensitive to outliers and identifies layers that make decisive corrections, and MASD, which robustly measures a layer's average contribution. Extensive experiments on multiple models ranging from 0.5B to 13B parameters demonstrate that SimDiff significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across various pruning ratios. Notably, our method retains over 91% of LLaMA2-7B's performance at a 25% pruning ratio and achieves up to a 1.49x inference speedup when pruning 12 layers on LLaMA3.1-8B. We also show that pruned models can be effectively recovered with minimal fine-tuning.