# Enhancing Tabular Anomaly Detection via Pseudo-Label-Guided Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18266 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.18266/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.04899/) (2019)
- [Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutout](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.04552/) (2017)
- [Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09457/) (2019)
- [Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GAN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.00503/) (2019)
- [Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01889/) (2021)
- [TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data with Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15421/) (2022)
- [Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06280/) (2022)
- [ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.09426/) (2022)
- [Mixed-Type Tabular Data Synthesis with Score-based Diffusion in Latent Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09656/) (2023)
- [ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.00382/) (2022)
- [COPOD: Copula-Based Outlier Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.09463/) (2020)
- [Deep Learning for Medical Anomaly Detection -- A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.02364/) (2020)
- [Neural Transformation Learning for Deep Anomaly Detection Beyond Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16440/) (2021)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Synthetic Tabular Data Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16506/) (2025)
- [Perturbation Learning Based Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02704/) (2022)
- [NNG-Mix: Improving Semi-supervised Anomaly Detection with Pseudo-anomaly Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11961/) (2023)
- [Deep Anomaly Detection under Labeling Budget Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07832/) (2023)
- [Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Rejection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13189/) (2023)
- [SafePredict: A Meta-Algorithm for Machine Learning That Uses Refusals to Guarantee Correctness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.06425/) (2017)
- [Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Tabular Data Using Noise Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11461/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying anomalous instances in tabular data is essential for improving data reliability and maintaining system stability. Due to the scarcity of ground-truth anomaly labels, existing methods mainly rely on unsupervised anomaly detection models, or exploit a small number of labeled anomalies to facilitate detection via sample generation or contrastive learning. However, unsupervised methods lack sufficient anomaly awareness, while current generation and contrastive approaches tend to compute anomalies globally, overlooking the localized anomaly patterns of tabular features, resulting in suboptimal detection performance. To address these limitations, we propose PLAG, a pseudo-label-guided anomaly generation method designed to enhance tabular anomaly detection. Specifically, by utilizing pseudo-anomalies as guidance signals and decoupling the overall anomaly quantification of a sample into an accumulation of feature-level abnormalities, PLAG not only effectively obviates the need for scarce ground-truth labels but also provides a novel perspective for the model to comprehend localized anomalous signals at a fine-grained level. Furthermore, a two-stage data selection strategy is proposed, integrating format verification and uncertainty estimation to rigorously filter candidate samples, thereby ensuring the fidelity and diversity of the synthetic anomalies. Ultimately, these filtered synthetic anomalies serve as robust discriminative guidance, empowering the model to better separate normal and anomalous instances. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PLAG achieves state-of-the-art performance against eight representative baselines. Moreover, as a flexible framework, it integrates seamlessly with existing unsupervised detectors, consistently boosting F1-scores by 0.08 to 0.21.