# EvoMaster: A Foundational Evolving Agent Framework for Agentic Science at Scale

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17406 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17406/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 21 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06292/) (2024)
- [OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16741/) (2024)
- [BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12516/) (2025)
- [ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05376/) (2023)
- [MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07095/) (2024)
- [The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08066/) (2025)
- [MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03302/) (2023)
- [PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01848/) (2025)
- [ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05080/) (2024)
- [BrowseComp-ZH: Benchmarking Web Browsing Ability of Large Language Models in Chinese](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19314/) (2025)
- [Language agents achieve superhuman synthesis of scientific knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13740/) (2024)
- [PostTrainBench: Can LLM Agents Automate LLM Post-Training?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08640/) (2026)
- [ML-Master: Towards AI-for-AI via Integration of Exploration and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.16499/) (2025)
- [MLE-STAR: Machine Learning Engineering Agent via Search and Targeted Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15692/) (2025)
- [SciMaster: Towards General-Purpose Scientific AI Agents, Part I. X-Master as Foundation: Can We Lead on Humanity's Last Exam?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05241/) (2025)
- [The OpenHands Software Agent SDK: A Composable and Extensible Foundation for Production Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.03690/) (2025)
- [R&D-Agent: An LLM-Agent Framework Towards Autonomous Data Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14738/) (2025)
- [Toward Ultra-Long-Horizon Agentic Science: Cognitive Accumulation for Machine Learning Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.10402/) (2026)
- [BrowseMaster: Towards Scalable Web Browsing via Tool-Augmented Programmatic Agent Pair](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09129/) (2025)
- [Bohrium + SciMaster: Building the Infrastructure and Ecosystem for Agentic Science at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.20469/) (2025)
- [PRL-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark Evaluating LLMs' Capabilities in Frontier Physics Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.15411/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.18661/) (2026)
- [NatureBench: Can Coding Agents Match the Published SOTA of Nature-Family Papers?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.24530/) (2026)
- [Frontis-MA1: Training an AI4AI Model towards Recursive Self-Improvement in Machine Learning Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.28568/) (2026)
- [Socratic agents for autonomous scientific discovery in high-dimensional physical systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26722/) (2026)
- [RSI-Master: Structuring Experiments to Guide Autonomous Model Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35561/) (2026)
- [ScienceClaw: Benchmarking Continual Self-Evolution of AI-for-Science Agents Across the Natural and Social Sciences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08691/) (2026)
- [Triage-PiEvo: Evidence Admission for Principle-Evolving Scientific Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14683/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The convergence of large language models and agents is catalyzing a new era of scientific discovery: Agentic Science. However, common agent infrastructure is repeatedly rebuilt across scientific fields (loop fragmentation) and useful evidence and experience are lost in long-horizon research (loop discontinuity), bringing obstacles to Agentic Science at Scale. We introduce EvoMaster, a foundational evolving agent framework for Agentic Science at Scale. EvoMaster handles loop fragmentation and loop discontinuity by implementing Loop Research in which external evidence persists and improves later decisions. Through three nested loops, Execution, Exploration and Evolution (E3), loop research connects research within runs, across experiments and across studies. Across ten benchmarks spanning scientific research, coding and reasoning, EvoMaster achieves the best score among four agents using GPT-5.4, reaching a mean score of 58.02%, and outperforms the strongest competing agent Codex(40.29%) while costing 35.6% less. These results show that a shared loop-research foundation can support diverse scientific agents at scale.