# Beyond Text-Dominance: Understanding Modality Preference of Omni-modal Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16902 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16902/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 27 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12966/) (2023)
- [Language Models as Knowledge Bases?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01066/) (2019)
- [Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00414/) (2019)
- [Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01644/) (2016)
- [BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05950/) (2019)
- [Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12452/) (2021)
- [Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16922/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03882/) (2023)
- [Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02013/) (2025)
- [Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04076/) (2023)
- [VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07566/) (2021)
- [Words or Vision: Do Vision-Language Models Have Blind Faith in Text?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02199/) (2025)
- [Ming-Omni: A Unified Multimodal Model for Perception and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09344/) (2025)
- [OmniVinci: Enhancing Architecture and Data for Omni-Modal Understanding LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15870/) (2025)
- [Can Large Audio-Language Models Truly Hear? Tackling Hallucinations with Multi-Task Assessment and Stepwise Audio Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16130/) (2024)
- [Looking Right is Sometimes Right: Investigating the Capabilities of Decoder-only LLMs for Sequence Labeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14556/) (2024)
- [SAE-V: Interpreting Multimodal Models for Enhanced Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17514/) (2025)
- [How Do Vision-Language Models Process Conflicting Information Across Modalities?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01790/) (2025)
- [From Specific-MLLMs to Omni-MLLMs: A Survey on MLLMs Aligned with Multi-modalities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11694/) (2024)
- [When Modalities Conflict: How Unimodal Reasoning Uncertainty Governs Preference Dynamics in MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.02243/) (2025)
- [Mixed Signals: Decoding VLMs' Reasoning and Underlying Bias in Vision-Language Conflict](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08974/) (2025)
- [See-Saw Modality Balance: See Gradient, and Sew Impaired Vision-Language Balance to Mitigate Dominant Modality Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13834/) (2025)
- [XModBench: Benchmarking Cross-Modal Capabilities and Consistency in Omni-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15148/) (2025)
- [MaLoRA: Gated Modality LoRA for Key-Space Alignment in Multimodal LLM Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.26721/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Diagnosing and Mitigating Perception-Decision Misalignment in Omni-LLMs via Modality Subspace Activation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.14655/) (2026)
- [EgoArgus: Benchmarking VLMs as Situational Assistants for Modality-Grounded User Supports](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.25561/) (2026)
- [Omni-Modal LLMs Know More Than They Say](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.16135/) (2026)
- [Vision-Language Models Integrate Conflicting Evidence Like Biased Bayesian Observers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19407/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Native Omni-modal Large Language Models (OLLMs) have shifted from pipeline architectures to unified representation spaces. However, this native integration gives rise to a critical yet underexplored phenomenon: modality preference. To bridge this gap, we first systematically quantify modality preference of OLLMs using a newly-curated conflict-based benchmark and the modality selection rate metric. Our evaluation of ten representative OLLMs reveals a notable paradigm shift: unlike the ``text-dominance'' of traditional VLMs, most OLLMs exhibit a pronounced visual preference. To further understand the underlying mechanism, we conduct layer-wise probing and demonstrate that such modality preference is not static but emerges progressively in the mid-to-late layers. Building upon these insights, we leverage these internal signals to diagnose cross-modal hallucinations, achieving competitive performance across three downstream multi-modal benchmarks without task-specific data. Our work provides both a mechanistic understanding and a practical tool for building more trustworthy OLLMs. Our code and related resources are publicly available at: https://github.com/icip-cas/OmniPreference