# The impact of postediting on AI generative translation in Yemeni context: Translating literary prose by ChatGPT

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16704 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16704/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [Consistency Analysis of ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.06273/) (2023)
- [The Impact of Post-editing and Machine Translation on Creativity and Reading Experience](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06125/) (2021)
- [What fifty-one years of Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence research tell us about their correlation: A scientometric analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.19858/) (2024)
- [Artificial intelligence contribution to translation industry: looking back and forward](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.19855/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study examines the role of artificial intelligence in translation, focusing on ChatGPT, specifically ChatGPT-4, and the extent to which human postediting is required in literary translation. A mixed-method approach was adopted, involving 30 professional translators who evaluated and postedited AI-generated translations of selected Arabic and English literary texts. The results show that although AI improves translation speed and accessibility, it remains limited in handling cultural, stylistic, and figurative aspects of language. Participants generally confirmed the necessity of human postediting, particularly in novels and drama. The findings indicate that emerging human-machine collaboration model rather than replacement of human translators. The study concludes that AI should be used as a supportive tool, while human expertise remains essential for ensuring translation quality and cultural appropriateness.