# Beyond Single-Score Ranking: Facet-Aware Reranking for Controllable Diversity in Paper Recommendation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16329 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16329/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.10676/) (2019)
- [Passage Re-ranking with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.04085/) (2019)
- [SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07180/) (2020)
- [The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10140/) (2023)
- [Neighborhood Contrastive Learning for Scientific Document Representations with Citation Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06671/) (2022)
- [Multi-Vector Models with Textual Guidance for Fine-Grained Scientific Document Similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08366/) (2021)
- [CSFCube -- A Test Collection of Computer Science Research Articles for Faceted Query by Example](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12906/) (2021)
- [Multi-Facet Blending for Faceted Query-by-Example Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01443/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Current paper recommendation systems output a single similarity score that mixes different notions of relatedness, so users cannot specify why papers should be similar. We present SciFACE (Scientific Faceted Cross-Encoder), a reranking framework that models two independent facets: Background (what problem is studied) and Method (how it is solved). SciFACE trains two separate cross-encoders on 5,891 real seed-candidate paper pairs labeled by GPT-4o-mini with facet-specific criteria and validated against human judgments. On CSFCube, SciFACE reaches 70.63 NDCG@20 on Background (5.9 points above SPECTER) and 49.06 NDCG@20 on Method (31.1 points above SPECTER), competitive with state-of-the-art results. Compared with FaBLE without citation pre-training, SciFACE improves Method NDCG@20 by 4.1 points while using 5,891 labeled pairs versus 40K synthetic augmentations. These results show that high-quality grounded facet labels can be more data-efficient than large-scale synthetic augmentation for learning fine-grained scientific similarity.