# Training Time Prediction for Mixed Precision-based Distributed Training

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16145 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16145/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08053/) (2019)
- [Mixed Precision Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.03740/) (2017)
- [vTrain: A Simulation Framework for Evaluating Cost-effective and Compute-optimal Large Language Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12391/) (2023)
- [Forecasting GPU Performance for Deep Learning Training and Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13853/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate prediction of training time in distributed deep learning is crucial for resource allocation, cost estimation, and job scheduling. We observe that the floating-point precision setting is a key determinant of training time, leading to training time variations of ~2.4x over its minimum. However, existing studies on distributed training time prediction rely on static model computation graphs that do not capture precision variations, including mixed precision. According to our experiments, training time prediction without considering precision results in significant prediction errors - reaching up to 147.85% in mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). To address this issue, we propose a precision-aware distributed training time predictor that achieves robust accuracy across diverse precision settings, including mixed precision, with 9.8% MAPE.