# An Analysis of Regularization and Fokker-Planck Residuals in Diffusion Models for Image Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15171 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.15171/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 9 of its 12 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion foundations and sampling](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-foundations-and-sampling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.05600/) (2019)
- [Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09797/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling with Critically-Damped Langevin Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07068/) (2021)
- [Understanding the Latent Space of Diffusion Models through the Lens of Riemannian Geometry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.12868/) (2023)
- [Target Score Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08667/) (2024)
- [FP-Diffusion: Improving Score-based Diffusion Models by Enforcing the Underlying Score Fokker-Planck Equation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04296/) (2022)
- [Consistent Sampling and Simulation: Molecular Dynamics with Energy-Based Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17139/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work has shown that diffusion models trained with the denoising score matching (DSM) objective often violate the Fokker--Planck (FP) equation that governs the evolution of the true data density. Directly penalizing these deviations in the objective function reduces their magnitude but introduces a significant computational overhead. It is also observed that enforcing strict adherence to the FP equation does not necessarily lead to improvements in the quality of the generated samples, as often the best results are obtained with weaker FP regularization. In this paper, we investigate whether simpler penalty terms can provide similar benefits. We empirically analyze several lightweight regularizers, study their effect on FP residuals and generation quality, and show that the benefits of FP regularization are available at substantially lower computational cost. Our code is available at https://github.com/OnnoNiemann/fp_diffusion_analysis.