# Quantifying Cross-Query Contradictions in Multi-Query LLM Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14525 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.14525/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 8 of its 13 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12295/) (2023)
- [MT-Eval: A Multi-Turn Capabilities Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.16745/) (2024)
- [SATBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Logical Reasoning via Automated Puzzle Generation from SAT Formulas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14615/) (2025)
- [Logic-of-Thought: Injecting Logic into Contexts for Full Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17539/) (2024)
- [JustLogic: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Deductive Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14851/) (2025)
- [MTR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multi-Turn Reasoning Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17123/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models frequently produce mutually inconsistent answers when reasoning over multiple related queries. We study case-file logical consistency: maintaining a globally satisfiable belief state across interdependent queries. We introduce a benchmark of 390 multi-query reasoning instances with entailment/contradiction/unknown labels and propose set-level metrics including Case Satisfiability Rate, Contradiction Density and Revision Cost. Our solver-augmented approach extracts commitments, verifies global satisfiability and performs counterexample-guided repair. Across four reasoning domains, our method substantially reduces cross-query contradictions (SetCons: 0.56 to 0.94) while preserving per-query accuracy, demonstrating that global coherence is critical for robust multi-query reasoning.