# Geometric Routing Enables Causal Expert Control in Mixture of Experts

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14434 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.14434/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Expert routing strategies, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts.
- Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- Mixture-of-experts / [Expert routing strategies](https://mlsanity.com/moe/expert-routing-strategies/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.06538/) (2017)
- [Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03961/) (2021)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Mixtral of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04088/) (2024)
- [GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Sharding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.16668/) (2020)
- [Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01405/) (2023)
- [Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03341/) (2023)
- [BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05950/) (2019)
- [What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04341/) (2019)
- [Toy Models of Superposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10652/) (2022)
- [DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06066/) (2024)
- [Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04093/) (2024)
- [Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14680/) (2022)
- [A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14507/) (2024)
- [Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04878/) (2025)
- [SAEs Are Good for Steering -- If You Select the Right Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20063/) (2025)
- [Decomposing The Dark Matter of Sparse Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14670/) (2024)
- [Towards Greater Leverage: Scaling Laws for Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17702/) (2025)
- [Monet: Mixture of Monosemantic Experts for Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04139/) (2024)
- [Towards a Comprehensive Scaling Law of Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23678/) (2025)
- [The Illusion of Specialization: Unveiling the Domain-Invariant "Standing Committee" in Mixture-of-Experts Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03425/) (2026)
- [Explaining Large Language Models with gSMILE](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21657/) (2025)
- [Sparsity and Superposition in Mixture of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.23671/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Diagnosing Overhead in Dispatch Operations: Cross-architecture Observatory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.20982/) (2026)
- [Score the Update, Not the Token: Descent-Aligned Routing for Combinatorial LoRA Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00493/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models scale parameters while fixing active computation per token, but the specialization of individual experts remains opaque. In a companion paper we showed that routing topology is quality-neutral: five structurally different configurations converge to statistically equivalent language modeling quality. Here we show that expert identity is nonetheless causally meaningful: individual rank-1 experts are monosemantic by construction, and cosine-similarity routing in a low-dimensional metric space makes their specialization directly inspectable. We present four lines of evidence. First, projecting expert output vectors through the unembedding matrix yields a Semantic Dictionary: 15% of experts are monosemantic specialists spanning 10 categories (temporal, geographic, cardinal, discourse, emotional, financial, military, scientific). Second, routing exhibits a frequency-to-syntax gradient: early layers separate tokens by word frequency, deeper layers by syntactic class (Zipf-confound controls, all p < 0.001). Third, causal interventions confirm these labels: steering toward a temporal expert's centroid increases P(temporal) by +321% (median across 44 prompts); suppressing a geographic expert drops P(geographic) by -23%; rewriting an expert's output vector halves target-category probability, and effects compose additively across layers. Fourth, the interventions are not unique to cosine routing: linear routers support comparable steering, but only cosine routing provides geometric transparency -- expert specialization is readable directly from the centroid matrix. MoE expert-level specialization is a first-class interpretability primitive: architecturally monosemantic, causally validated, and controllable at inference with zero overhead.