# CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13946 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13946/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01210/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14196/) (2024)
- [Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21787/) (2024)
- [CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00859/) (2021)
- [CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13474/) (2022)
- [CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07339/) (2024)
- [Self-collaboration Code Generation via ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07590/) (2023)
- [MapCoder: Multi-Agent Code Generation for Competitive Problem Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11403/) (2024)
- [Retrieval Augmented Code Generation and Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.11601/) (2021)
- [Abstract Syntax Networks for Code Generation and Semantic Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.07535/) (2017)
- [CodeScore: Evaluating Code Generation by Learning Code Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.09043/) (2023)
- [xCodeEval: A Large Scale Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Code Understanding, Generation, Translation and Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03004/) (2023)
- [Automatic Programming: Large Language Models and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02213/) (2024)
- [CODESIM: Multi-Agent Code Generation and Problem Solving through Simulation-Driven Planning and Debugging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05664/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Thought in Neural Code Generation: From and For Lightweight Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.05562/) (2023)
- [Deep Learning Meets Software Engineering: A Survey on Pre-Trained Models of Source Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11739/) (2022)
- [A Pair Programming Framework for Code Generation via Multi-Plan Exploration and Feedback-Driven Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.05001/) (2024)
- [Thinking Before Running! Efficient Code Generation with Thorough Exploration and Optimal Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17442/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Automated code generation remains a persistent challenge in software engineering, as conventional multi-agent frameworks are often constrained by static planning, isolated execution, high computational overhead, and limited adaptability to complex tasks. This paper introduces CollabCoder, a novel Plan-Code Co-Evolution framework that improves code generation through dynamic multi-agent collaboration. The core idea is to design a collaborative decision-making process between the plan module and the code module to decide which module should be executed for the debugging process. Extensive experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that CollabCoder consistently improves code quality and robustness across tasks. Importantly, CollabCoder achieves performance comparable to or exceeding current state-of-the-art methods while reducing computational overhead, with efficiency gains becoming more pronounced as benchmark difficulty increases. On the more challenging LiveCodeBench and xCodeEval benchmarks, our approach improves performance by 11-20% over strong baselines while reducing the number of API calls by an average of 4-10 per execution.