# Beyond Conservative Automated Driving in Multi-Agent Scenarios via Coupled Model Predictive Control and Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13891 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13891/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving.
- Builds on 3 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- End-to-end autonomous driving / [Reinforcement learning for driving](https://mlsanity.com/driving/reinforcement-learning-for-driving/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.03295/) (2016)
- [Event-Triggered Model Predictive Control with Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.10302/) (2022)
- [Automated Vehicles at Unsignalized Intersections: Safety and Efficiency Implications of Mixed Human and Automated Traffic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12538/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Automated driving at unsignalized intersections is challenging due to complex multi-vehicle interactions and the need to balance safety and efficiency. Model Predictive Control (MPC) offers structured constraint handling through optimization but relies on hand-crafted rules that often produce overly conservative behavior. Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) learns adaptive behaviors from experience but often struggles with safety assurance and generalization to unseen environments. In this study, we present an integrated MPC-RL framework to improve navigation performance in multi-agent scenarios. Experiments show that MPC-RL outperforms standalone MPC and end-to-end RL across three traffic-density levels. Collectively, MPC-RL reduces the collision rate by 21% and improves the success rate by 6.5% compared to pure MPC. We further evaluate zero-shot transfer to a highway merging scenario without retraining. Both MPC-based methods transfer substantially better than end-to-end PPO, which highlights the role of the MPC backbone in cross-scenario robustness. The framework also shows faster loss stabilization than end-to-end RL during training, which indicates a reduced learning burden. These results suggest that the integrated approach can improve the balance between safety performance and efficiency in multi-agent intersection scenarios, while the MPC component provides a strong foundation for generalization across driving environments. The implementation code is available open-source.
