# GeoAgentBench: A Dynamic Execution Benchmark for Tool-Augmented Agents in Spatial Analysis

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13888 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13888/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 37 of its 62 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08244/) (2023)
- [Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04091/) (2023)
- [DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11501/) (2022)
- [GeoChat: Grounded Large Vision-Language Model for Remote Sensing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.15826/) (2023)
- [CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07339/) (2024)
- [RSVQA: Visual Question Answering for Remote Sensing Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.07333/) (2020)
- [MatPlotAgent: Method and Evaluation for LLM-Based Agentic Scientific Data Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11453/) (2024)
- [Data-Copilot: Bridging Billions of Data and Humans with Autonomous Workflow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07209/) (2023)
- [K2: A Foundation Language Model for Geoscience Knowledge Understanding and Utilization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05064/) (2023)
- [GPT4GEO: How a Language Model Sees the World's Geography](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00020/) (2023)
- [GeoLLM: Extracting Geospatial Knowledge from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06213/) (2023)
- [Autonomous GIS: the next-generation AI-powered GIS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06453/) (2023)
- [ThinkGeo: Evaluating Tool-Augmented Agents for Remote Sensing Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23752/) (2025)
- [Earth-Agent: Unlocking the Full Landscape of Earth Observation with Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23141/) (2025)
- [GIS Copilot: Towards an Autonomous GIS Agent for Spatial Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03205/) (2024)
- [An Autonomous GIS Agent Framework for Geospatial Data Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21024/) (2024)
- [Foundation Models for Geospatial Reasoning: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Understanding Geometries and Topological Spatial Relations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17136/) (2025)
- [CHOICE: Benchmarking the Remote Sensing Capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.18145/) (2024)
- [Multi-Agent Geospatial Copilots for Remote Sensing Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.16254/) (2025)
- [Designing Domain-Specific Agents via Hierarchical Task Abstraction Mechanism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.17198/) (2025)
- [GeoBenchX: Benchmarking LLMs in Agent Solving Multistep Geospatial Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18129/) (2025)
- [GeoAnalystBench: A GeoAI benchmark for assessing large language models for spatial analysis workflow and code generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.05881/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [ANASSA: An Agentic AI Orchestration Framework for Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14824/) (2026)
- [Earth-Agent-Pro: Towards Real-World Full-Chain Earth Observation with Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.12533/) (2026)
- [DUDA-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Multimodal Data-Driven Urban Diagnosis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.09374/) (2026)
- [ANASSA: From High-Level Framework to Low-Level Architecture for Spatial Agentic AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14382/) (2026)
- [Google Earth AI Geospatial Reasoning Agent: Capabilities and a Systematic Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.15750/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into Geographic Information Systems (GIS) marks a paradigm shift toward autonomous spatial analysis. However, evaluating these LLM-based agents remains challenging due to the complex, multi-step nature of geospatial workflows. Existing benchmarks primarily rely on static text or code matching, neglecting dynamic runtime feedback and the multimodal nature of spatial outputs. To address this gap, we introduce GeoAgentBench (GABench), a dynamic and interactive evaluation benchmark tailored for tool-augmented GIS agents. GABench provides a realistic execution sandbox integrating 117 atomic GIS tools, encompassing 53 typical spatial analysis tasks across 6 core GIS domains. Recognizing that precise parameter configuration is the primary determinant of execution success in dynamic GIS environments, we designed the Parameter Execution Accuracy (PEA) metric, which utilizes a "Last-Attempt Alignment" strategy to quantify the fidelity of implicit parameter inference. Complementing this, a Vision-Language Model (VLM) based verification is proposed to assess data-spatial accuracy and cartographic style adherence. Furthermore, to address the frequent task failures caused by parameter misalignments and runtime anomalies, we developed a novel agent architecture, Plan-and-React, that mimics expert cognitive workflows by decoupling global orchestration from step-wise reactive execution. Extensive experiments with seven representative LLMs demonstrate that the Plan-and-React paradigm significantly outperforms traditional frameworks, achieving the optimal balance between logical rigor and execution robustness, particularly in multi-step reasoning and error recovery. Our findings highlight current capability boundaries and establish a robust standard for assessing and advancing the next generation of autonomous GeoAI.