# Hybrid Retrieval for COVID-19 Literature: Comparing Rank Fusion and Projection Fusion with Diversity Reranking

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13728 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13728/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04906/) (2020)
- [BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08663/) (2021)
- [SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.05720/) (2021)
- [Sparse, Dense, and Attentional Representations for Text Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00181/) (2020)
- [CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10706/) (2020)
- [SPLADE v2: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for Information Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.10086/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present a hybrid retrieval system for COVID-19 scientific literature, evaluated on the TREC-COVID benchmark (171,332 papers, 50 expert queries). The system implements six retrieval configurations spanning sparse (SPLADE), dense (BGE), rank-level fusion (RRF), and a projection-based vector fusion (B5) approach. RRF fusion achieves the best relevance (nDCG@10 = 0.828), outperforming dense-only by 6.1% and sparse-only by 14.9%. Our projection fusion variant reaches nDCG@10 = 0.678 on expert queries while being 33% faster (847 ms vs. 1271 ms) and producing 2.2x higher ILD@10 than RRF. Evaluation across 400 queries -- including expert, machine-generated, and three paraphrase styles -- shows that B5 delivers the largest relative gain on keyword-heavy reformulations (+8.8%), although RRF remains best in absolute nDCG@10. On expert queries, MMR reranking increases intra-list diversity by 23.8-24.5% at a 20.4-25.4% nDCG@10 cost. Both fusion pipelines evaluated for latency remain below the sub-2 s target across all query sets. The system is deployed as a Streamlit web application backed by Pinecone serverless indices.