# English is Not All You Need: Systematically Exploring the Role of Multilinguality in LLM Post-Training

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13286 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13286/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02116/) (2019)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08244/) (2023)
- [Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03057/) (2022)
- [Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17935/) (2024)
- [Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12688/) (2019)
- [Do Multilingual Language Models Think Better in English?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01223/) (2023)
- [Do Multilingual LLMs Think In English?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15603/) (2025)
- [Multilingual Instruction Tuning With Just a Pinch of Multilinguality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01854/) (2024)
- [Monolingual or Multilingual Instruction Tuning: Which Makes a Better Alpaca](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08958/) (2023)
- [Revisiting the Primacy of English in Zero-shot Cross-lingual Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.16171/) (2021)
- [Turning English-centric LLMs Into Polyglots: How Much Multilinguality Is Needed?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12683/) (2023)
- [mCoT: Multilingual Instruction Tuning for Reasoning Consistency in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02301/) (2024)
- [When Is Multilinguality a Curse? Language Modeling for 250 High- and Low-Resource Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09205/) (2023)
- [BenchMAX: A Comprehensive Multilingual Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07346/) (2025)
- [ATLAS: Adaptive Transfer Scaling Laws for Multilingual Pretraining, Finetuning, and Decoding the Curse of Multilinguality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.22037/) (2025)
- [Evaluating the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion of NLP Technology: A Case Study for Indian Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12676/) (2022)
- [Zero-shot cross-lingual transfer in instruction tuning of large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14778/) (2024)
- [A Post-trainer's Guide to Multilingual Training Data: Uncovering Cross-lingual Transfer Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16677/) (2025)
- [How Many Languages Make Good Multilingual Instruction Tuning? A Case Study on BLOOM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04850/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the widespread multilingual deployment of large language models, post-training pipelines remain predominantly English-centric, contributing to performance disparities across languages. We present a systematic, controlled study of the interplay between training language coverage, model scale, and task domain, based on 220 supervised fine-tuning runs on parallel translated multilingual data mixtures spanning mathematical reasoning and API calling tasks, with models up to 8B parameters. We find that English-only post-training is typically suboptimal: incorporating even a single non-English language improves both English performance and cross-lingual generalization. Increasing language diversity during post-training generally yields further gains, particularly for low-resource languages, while performance on high-resource languages tends to plateau rather than degrade. Moreover, greater language diversity enables strong zero-shot transfer to unseen languages, reducing the need for direct inclusion, though gains remain limited for typologically distant, low-resource languages.
