# Unleashing Implicit Rewards: Prefix-Value Learning for Distribution-Level Optimization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13197 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13197/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 12 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Process reward models for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/process-reward-models-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02438/) (2015)
- [Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01456/) (2025)
- [The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22617/) (2025)
- [Process Reward Models That Think](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16828/) (2025)
- [What's Behind PPO's Collapse in Long-CoT? Value Optimization Holds the Secret](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01491/) (2025)
- [Generalist Reward Models: Found Inside Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23235/) (2025)
- [Look Inward to Explore Outward: Learning Temperature Policy from LLM Internal States via Hierarchical RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13035/) (2026)
- [Self-Guided Process Reward Optimization with Redefined Step-wise Advantage for Process Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01551/) (2025)
- [Stabilizing Policy Optimization via Logits Convexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00963/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [From Candidate Tokens to Final Outcomes: Decoding Relative Long-Horizon Candidate Value from Reasoning Model Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.15412/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Process reward models (PRMs) provide fine-grained supervision for reasoning, but reliable PRMs often require step annotations or heavy verification pipelines, making them costly to scale and refresh during online RL. Implicit PRMs reduce this cost by training log-likelihood-ratio rewards from trajectory-level outcome labels. However, the log-ratio is constrained only as a sequence-level aggregate during training, while inference decomposes it into token- or step-level scores for partial prefixes. This train-inference mismatch leaves local credits weakly identified, so distribution-wide scoring can amplify misleading advantages. We propose Implicit Prefix-Value Reward Model (IPVRM), which directly learns the probability of eventual correctness for each prefix from outcome labels. Step signals are then obtained as temporal-difference (TD) differences between consecutive prefix values, aligning the training target with inference-time use. IPVRM markedly improves step-verification F1 on ProcessBench. To exploit these prefix values during policy optimization, we further introduce Distribution-Level RL (DistRL), which applies TD advantages to both sampled tokens and high-probability candidate tokens, providing dense counterfactual updates without additional rollouts. Experiments show that DistRL brings limited gains with unreliable implicit rewards, but consistently improves downstream reasoning when paired with IPVRM. The implementation of our method is available at https://github.com/gaoshiping/IPVRM .