# Can Coding Agents Be General Agents?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13107 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13107/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 8 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01030/) (2024)
- [Unified Pre-training for Program Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06333/) (2021)
- [Sycophancy to Subterfuge: Investigating Reward-Tampering in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10162/) (2024)
- [To Code, or Not To Code? Exploring Impact of Code in Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.10914/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [SCATE: Learning to Supervise Coding Agents for Cost-Effective Test Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.08983/) (2026)
- [Applying Anthropic Primitives at Large Enterprises: Harness Paradigm for Knowledge Work](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20622/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As coding agents have seen rapid capability and adoption gains, users are applying them to general tasks beyond software engineering. In this post, we investigate whether coding agents can successfully generalize to end-to-end business process automation. We identify gaps in current evaluations, and conduct a case study to evaluate a coding agent on practical business tasks in an open-core Enterprise Resource Planning system. We find that the agent reliably completes simple tasks but exhibits characteristic failures on complex tasks, suggesting that bridging domain logic and code execution is a key bottleneck to generalizability.
