# Safe reinforcement learning with online filtering for fatigue-predictive human-robot task planning and allocation in production

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12667 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12667/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 19 of its 83 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL for energy, networks and operations](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-for-energy-networks-and-operations/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.06461/) (2015)
- [Prioritized Experience Replay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.05952/) (2015)
- [Constrained Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.10528/) (2017)
- [Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06581/) (2015)
- [Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.08611/) (2017)
- [Reward Constrained Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.11074/) (2018)
- [Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.03964/) (2020)
- [Lyapunov-based Safe Policy Optimization for Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.10031/) (2019)
- [IPO: Interior-point Policy Optimization under Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09615/) (2019)
- [Constraints Penalized Q-learning for Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.09003/) (2021)
- [GPU-Accelerated Robotic Simulation for Distributed Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.05762/) (2018)
- [OmniSafe: An Infrastructure for Accelerating Safe Reinforcement Learning Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09304/) (2023)
- [Penalized Proximal Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11814/) (2022)
- [A Comparative Study of Deep Reinforcement Learning Models: DQN vs PPO vs A2C](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14151/) (2024)
- [An Ergonomic Role Allocation Framework for Dynamic Human-Robot Collaborative Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07999/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Human-robot collaborative manufacturing, a core aspect of Industry 5.0, emphasizes ergonomics to enhance worker well-being. This paper addresses the dynamic human-robot task planning and allocation (HRTPA) problem, which involves determining when to perform tasks and who should execute them to maximize efficiency while ensuring workers' physical fatigue remains within safe limits. The inclusion of fatigue constraints, combined with production dynamics, significantly increases the complexity of the HRTPA problem. Traditional fatigue-recovery models in HRTPA often rely on static, predefined hyperparameters. However, in practice, human fatigue sensitivity varies daily due to factors such as changed work conditions and insufficient sleep. To better capture this uncertainty, we treat fatigue-related parameters as inaccurate and estimate them online based on observed fatigue progression during production. To address these challenges, we propose PF-CD3Q, a safe reinforcement learning (safe RL) approach that integrates the particle filter with constrained dueling double deep Q-learning for real-time fatigue-predictive HRTPA. Specifically, we first develop PF-based estimators to track human fatigue and update fatigue model parameters in real-time. These estimators are then integrated into CD3Q by making task-level fatigue predictions during decision-making and excluding tasks that exceed fatigue limits, thereby constraining the action space and formulating the problem as a constrained Markov decision process (CMDP).