# A Scoping Review of Large Language Model-Based Pedagogical Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12253 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12253/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Educational agents and math problem solving, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 22 of its 63 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Educational agents and math problem solving](https://mlsanity.com/agents/educational-agents-and-math-problem-solving/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [S3: Social-network Simulation System with Large Language Model-Empowered Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14984/) (2023)
- [Simulating Classroom Education with LLM-Empowered Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19226/) (2024)
- [CodeAid: Evaluating a Classroom Deployment of an LLM-based Programming Assistant that Balances Student and Educator Needs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11314/) (2024)
- [EduChat: A Large-Scale Language Model-based Chatbot System for Intelligent Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02773/) (2023)
- [Navigating the Risks: A Survey of Security, Privacy, and Ethics Threats in LLM-Based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.09523/) (2024)
- [A Toolbox for Surfacing Health Equity Harms and Biases in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12025/) (2024)
- [EduAgent: Generative Student Agents in Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07963/) (2024)
- [GPT-3-driven pedagogical agents for training children's curious question-asking skills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14228/) (2022)
- [TeachTune: Reviewing Pedagogical Agents Against Diverse Student Profiles with Simulated Students](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04078/) (2024)
- [A large language model-assisted education tool to provide feedback on open-ended responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02439/) (2023)
- [Impact of Guidance and Interaction Strategies for LLM Use on Learner Performance and Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13712/) (2023)
- [PeerGPT: Probing the Roles of LLM-based Peer Agents as Team Moderators and Participants in Children's Collaborative Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14227/) (2024)
- [From MOOC to MAIC: Reshaping Online Teaching and Learning through LLM-driven Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.03512/) (2024)
- [A review on the use of large language models as virtual tutors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11983/) (2024)
- [Iris: An AI-Driven Virtual Tutor For Computer Science Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.08008/) (2024)
- [ELLMA-T: an Embodied LLM-agent for Supporting English Language Learning in Social VR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02406/) (2024)
- [Generating AI Literacy MCQs: A Multi-Agent LLM Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.00970/) (2024)
- [Whose ChatGPT? Unveiling Real-World Educational Inequalities Introduced by Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22282/) (2024)
- [The global landscape of academic guidelines for generative AI and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18842/) (2024)
- [Cognition is All You Need -- The Next Layer of AI Above Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02164/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Agentic Education: Using Claude Code to Teach Claude Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17460/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This scoping review examines the emerging field of Large Language Model (LLM)-based pedagogical agents in educational settings. While traditional pedagogical agents have been extensively studied, the integration of LLMs represents a transformative advancement with unprecedented capabilities in natural language understanding, reasoning, and adaptation. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we analyzed 52 studies across five major databases from November 2022 to January 2025. Our findings reveal diverse LLM-based agents spanning K-12, higher education, and informal learning contexts across multiple subject domains. We identified four key design dimensions characterizing these agents: interaction approach (reactive vs. proactive), domain scope (domain-specific vs. general-purpose), role complexity (single-role vs. multi-role), and system integration (standalone vs. integrated). Emerging trends include multi-agent systems that simulate naturalistic learning environments, virtual student simulation for agent evaluation, integration with immersive technologies, and combinations with learning analytics. We also discuss significant research gaps and ethical considerations regarding privacy, accuracy, and student autonomy. This review provides researchers and practitioners with a comprehensive understanding of LLM-based pedagogical agents while identifying crucial areas for future development in this rapidly evolving field.