# AdversarialCoT: Single-Document Retrieval Poisoning for LLM Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12201 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12201/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 19 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)
- Retrieval-augmented generation / [Privacy and security of RAG](https://mlsanity.com/rag/privacy-and-security-of-rag/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09268/) (2016)
- [Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09516/) (2025)
- [Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.03299/) (2022)
- [Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09687/) (2023)
- [Group Sequence Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18071/) (2025)
- [Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.20534/) (2025)
- [GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06471/) (2025)
- [Search-o1: Agentic Search-Enhanced Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05366/) (2025)
- [PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07867/) (2024)
- [HijackRAG: Hijacking Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22832/) (2024)
- [FlippedRAG: Black-Box Opinion Manipulation Adversarial Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.02968/) (2025)
- [Thinking Machines: A Survey of LLM based Reasoning Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10814/) (2025)
- [Ground Every Sentence: Improving Retrieval-Augmented LLMs with Interleaved Reference-Claim Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01796/) (2024)
- [SmartRAG: Jointly Learn RAG-Related Tasks From the Environment Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18141/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Large Language Models in Misinformation Ecosystems: Misuse, Defense, and Vulnerability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.10402/) (2026)
- [DenialRAG: Single-Document RAG Poisoning via Embedded Parametric Denial](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.02678/) (2026)
- [RAG-NAROK: Retrieval-Aware Knowledge Corpus Poisoning in RAG with Source-specific Refutation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25469/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language model (LLM) reasoning by retrieving external documents, but also opens up new attack surfaces. We study knowledge-base poisoning attacks in RAG, where an attacker injects malicious content into the retrieval corpus, which is then naturally surfaced by the retriever and consumed by the LLM during reasoning. Unlike prior work that floods the corpus with poisoned documents, we propose AdversarialCoT, a query-specific attack that poisons only a single document in the corpus. AdversarialCoT first extracts the target LLM's reasoning framework to guide the construction of an initial adversarial chain-of-thought (CoT). The adversarial document is iteratively refined through interactions with the LLM, progressively exposing and exploiting critical reasoning vulnerabilities. Experiments on benchmark LLMs show that a single adversarial document can significantly degrade reasoning accuracy, revealing subtle yet impactful weaknesses. This study exposes security risks in RAG systems and provides actionable insights for designing more robust LLM reasoning pipelines.