# Budget-Aware Uncertainty for Radiotherapy Segmentation QA Using nnU-Net

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11798 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.11798/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.01474/) (2016)
- [Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.07356/) (2018)
- [nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09556/) (2024)
- [Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.13273/) (2019)
- [PHiSeg: Capturing Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04045/) (2019)
- [ValUES: A Framework for Systematic Validation of Uncertainty Estimation in Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08501/) (2024)
- [Efficient Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation for nnU-Net](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06278/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate delineation of the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) is essential for radiotherapy planning, yet remains time-consuming and difficult to assess, especially for complex treatments such as Total Marrow and Lymph Node Irradiation (TMLI). While deep learning-based auto-segmentation can reduce workload, safe clinical deployment requires reliable cues indicating where models may be wrong. In this work, we propose a budget-aware uncertainty-driven quality assurance (QA) framework built on nnU-Net, combining uncertainty quantification and post-hoc calibration to produce voxel-wise uncertainty maps (based on predictive entropy) that can guide targeted manual review. We compare temperature scaling (TS), deep ensembles (DE), checkpoint ensembles (CE), and test-time augmentation (TTA), evaluated both individually and in combination on TMLI as a representative use case. Reliability is assessed through ROI-masked calibration metrics and uncertainty--error alignment under realistic revision constraints, summarized as AUC over the top 0-5% most uncertain voxels. Across configurations, segmentation accuracy remains stable, whereas TS substantially improves calibration. Uncertainty-error alignment improves most with calibrated checkpoint-based inference, leading to uncertainty maps that highlight more consistently regions requiring manual edits. Overall, integrating calibration with efficient ensembling seems a promising strategy to implement a budget-aware QA workflow for radiotherapy segmentation.