# On the Robustness of Watermarking for Autoregressive Image Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11720 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.11720/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 42 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Watermarking generated content and models](https://mlsanity.com/safety/watermarking-generated-content-and-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 42)

- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02502/) (2020)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Taming Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09841/) (2020)
- [MaskGIT: Masked Generative Image Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04200/) (2022)
- [Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02905/) (2024)
- [Chameleon: Mixed-Modal Early-Fusion Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.09818/) (2024)
- [Emu3: Next-Token Prediction is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18869/) (2024)
- [Autoregressive Model Beats Diffusion: Llama for Scalable Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06525/) (2024)
- [A Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10226/) (2023)
- [Autoregressive Image Generation without Vector Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11838/) (2024)
- [Muse: Text-To-Image Generation via Masked Generative Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00704/) (2023)
- [The Stable Signature: Rooting Watermarks in Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15435/) (2023)
- [Infinity: Scaling Bitwise AutoRegressive Modeling for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04431/) (2024)
- [Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MAD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01850/) (2023)
- [On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04634/) (2023)
- [Fluid: Scaling Autoregressive Text-to-image Generative Models with Continuous Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13863/) (2024)
- [Gaussian Shading: Provable Performance-Lossless Image Watermarking for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04956/) (2024)
- [Invisible Image Watermarks Are Provably Removable Using Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01953/) (2023)
- [HART: Efficient Visual Generation with Hybrid Autoregressive Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10812/) (2024)
- [Randomized Autoregressive Visual Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00776/) (2024)
- [ANOLE: An Open, Autoregressive, Native Large Multimodal Models for Interleaved Image-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06135/) (2024)
- [WAVES: Benchmarking the Robustness of Image Watermarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08573/) (2024)
- [RingID: Rethinking Tree-Ring Watermarking for Enhanced Multi-Key Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14055/) (2024)
- [An Undetectable Watermark for Generative Image Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07369/) (2024)
- [NextStep-1: Toward Autoregressive Image Generation with Continuous Tokens at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10711/) (2025)
- [Leveraging Optimization for Adaptive Attacks on Image Watermarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16952/) (2023)
- [Black-Box Forgery Attacks on Semantic Watermarks for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03283/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Trustworthy synthetic visual media: Evidence across the media lifecycle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34232/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The proliferation of autoregressive (AR) image generators demands reliable detection and attribution of their outputs to mitigate misinformation, and to filter synthetic images from training data to prevent model collapse. To address this need, watermarking techniques, specifically designed for AR models, embed a subtle signal at generation time, enabling downstream verification through a corresponding watermark detector. In this work, we study these schemes and demonstrate their vulnerability to both watermark removal and forgery attacks. We assess existing attacks and further introduce three new attacks: (i) a vector-quantized regeneration removal attack, (ii) adversarial optimization-based attack, and (iii) a frequency injection attack. Our evaluation reveals that removal and forgery attacks can be effective with access to a single watermarked reference image and without access to original model parameters or watermarking secrets. Our findings indicate that existing watermarking schemes for AR image generation do not reliably support synthetic content detection for dataset filtering. Moreover, they enable Watermark Mimicry, whereby authentic images can be manipulated to imitate a generator's watermark and trigger false detection to prevent their inclusion in future model training.
