# Sign Language Recognition in the Age of LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11225 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.11225/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00190/) (2021)
- [The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08691/) (2021)
- [Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05557/) (2022)
- [Spatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07455/) (2018)
- [Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14683/) (2025)
- [Word-level Deep Sign Language Recognition from Video: A New Large-scale Dataset and Methods Comparison](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.11006/) (2019)
- [MS-ASL: A Large-Scale Data Set and Benchmark for Understanding American Sign Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.01053/) (2018)
- [AUTSL: A Large Scale Multi-modal Turkish Sign Language Dataset and Baseline Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.00932/) (2020)
- [SignBERT: Pre-Training of Hand-Model-Aware Representation for Sign Language Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05382/) (2021)
- [SignBERT+: Hand-model-aware Self-supervised Pre-training for Sign Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04868/) (2023)
- [Sign2GPT: Leveraging Large Language Models for Gloss-Free Sign Language Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04164/) (2024)
- [Uni-Sign: Toward Unified Sign Language Understanding at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15187/) (2025)
- [Towards Privacy-Aware Sign Language Translation at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09611/) (2024)
- [Global-local Enhancement Network for NMFs-aware Sign Language Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.10428/) (2020)
- [SHuBERT: Self-Supervised Sign Language Representation Learning via Multi-Stream Cluster Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16765/) (2024)
- [Scaling up Multimodal Pre-training for Sign Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08544/) (2024)
- [SignMusketeers: An Efficient Multi-Stream Approach for Sign Language Translation at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06907/) (2024)
- [LLaVA-SLT: Visual Language Tuning for Sign Language Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16524/) (2024)
- [Scaling Sign Language Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11855/) (2024)
- [Lost in Translation, Found in Embeddings: Sign Language Translation and Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.08040/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent Vision Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of multimodal reasoning tasks. This raises the question of whether such general-purpose models can also address specialized visual recognition problems such as isolated sign language recognition (ISLR) without task-specific training. In this work, we investigate the capability of modern VLMs to perform ISLR in a zero-shot setting. We evaluate several open-source and proprietary VLMs on the WLASL300 benchmark. Our experiments show that, under prompt-only zero-shot inference, current open-source VLMs remain far behind classic supervised ISLR classifiers by a wide margin. However, follow-up experiments reveal that these models capture partial visual-semantic alignment between signs and text descriptions. Larger proprietary models achieve substantially higher accuracy, highlighting the importance of model scale and training data diversity. All our code is publicly available on GitHub.