# Universal statistical signatures of evolution in artificial intelligence architectures

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10571 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.10571/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 3 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [The Oracle's Fingerprint: Correlated AI Forecasting Errors and the Limits of Bias Transmission](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00844/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We test whether artificial intelligence architectural evolution obeys the same statistical laws as biological evolution. Compiling 935 ablation experiments from 161 publications, we show that the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of architectural modifications follows a heavy-tailed Student's t-distribution with proportions (68% deleterious, 19% neutral, 13% beneficial for major ablations, n=568) that place AI between compact viral genomes and simple eukaryotes. The DFE shape matches D. melanogaster (normalized KS=0.07) and S. cerevisiae (KS=0.09); the elevated beneficial fraction (13% vs. 1-6% in biology) quantifies the advantage of directed over blind search while preserving the distributional form. Architectural origination follows logistic dynamics (R^2=0.994) with punctuated equilibria and adaptive radiation into domain niches. Fourteen architectural traits were independently invented 3-5 times, paralleling biological convergences. These results demonstrate that the statistical structure of evolution is substrate-independent, determined by fitness landscape topology rather than the mechanism of selection.