# PlanGuard: Defending Agents against Indirect Prompt Injection via Planning-based Consistency Verification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10134 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.10134/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 20 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)
- LLM safety and security / [Prompt injection and agent security](https://mlsanity.com/safety/prompt-injection-and-agent-security/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02483/) (2023)
- [Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12173/) (2023)
- [Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09527/) (2022)
- [Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15217/) (2023)
- [Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00614/) (2023)
- [Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05499/) (2023)
- [InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02691/) (2024)
- [Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05566/) (2024)
- [LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04088/) (2022)
- [Detecting Language Model Attacks with Perplexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14132/) (2023)
- [StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06363/) (2024)
- [NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Rails](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10501/) (2023)
- [AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18666/) (2025)
- [SecAlign: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05451/) (2024)
- [Optimization-based Prompt Injection Attack to LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17710/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Indirect Prompt Injection via Instruction-Following Intent Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.00966/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.10749/) (2026)
- [Plan Pointers and Record-Directive Form in Budgeted Verification of Inherited Agent Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03450/) (2026)
- [Understanding and Exploiting Initialization Anchoring Weakness in Feedback-Based Agent Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29697/) (2026)
- [Pincer: Resource Authorization for Agents using a Digital Twin](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02569/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly integrated into critical systems, leveraging external tools to interact with the real world. However, this capability exposes them to Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI), where attackers embed malicious instructions into retrieved content to manipulate the agent into executing unauthorized or unintended actions. Existing defenses predominantly focus on the pre-processing stage, neglecting the monitoring of the model's actual behavior. In this paper, we propose PlanGuard, a training-free defense framework based on the principle of Context Isolation. Unlike prior methods, PlanGuard introduces an isolated Planner that generates a reference set of valid actions derived solely from user instructions. In addition, we design a Hierarchical Verification Mechanism that first enforces strict hard constraints to block unauthorized tool invocations, and subsequently employs an Intent Verifier to validate whether parameter deviations are benign formatting variances or malicious hijacking. Experiments on the InjecAgent benchmark demonstrate that PlanGuard effectively neutralizes these attacks, reducing the Attack Success Rate (ASR) from 72.8% to 0%, while maintaining an acceptable False Positive Rate of 1.49%. Furthermore, our method is model-agnostic and highly compatible.