# A Comparative Study of Modern Object Detectors for Robust Apple Detection in Orchard Imagery

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09996 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09996/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01497/) (2015)
- [End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.12872/) (2020)
- [Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.03144/) (2016)
- [You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02640/) (2015)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.02325/) (2015)
- [Searching for MobileNetV3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.02244/) (2019)
- [FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01355/) (2019)
- [DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08069/) (2023)
- [YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14458/) (2024)
- [MinneApple: A Benchmark Dataset for Apple Detection and Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06441/) (2019)
- [Deep Fruit Detection in Orchards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.03677/) (2016)
- [A Comparative Study of Fruit Detection and Counting Methods for Yield Mapping in Apple Orchards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.09499/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate apple detection in orchard images is important for yield prediction, fruit counting, robotic harvesting, and crop monitoring. However, changing illumination, leaf clutter, dense fruit clusters, and partial occlusion make detection difficult. To provide a fair and reproducible comparison, this study establishes a controlled benchmark for single-class apple detection on the public AppleBBCH81 dataset using one deterministic train, validation, and test split and a unified evaluation protocol across six representative detectors: YOLOv10n, YOLO11n, RT-DETR-L, Faster R-CNN (ResNet50-FPN), FCOS (ResNet50-FPN), and SSDLite320 (MobileNetV3-Large). Performance is evaluated primarily using COCO-style mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95, and threshold-dependent behavior is further analyzed using precision-recall curves and fixed-threshold precision, recall, and F1-score at IoU = 0.5. On the validation split, YOLO11n achieves the best strict localization performance with mAP@0.5:0.95 = 0.6065 and mAP@0.5 = 0.9620, followed closely by RT-DETR-L and YOLOv10n. At a fixed operating point with confidence >= 0.05, YOLOv10n attains the highest F1-score, whereas RT-DETR-L achieves very high recall but low precision because of many false positives at low confidence. These findings show that detector selection for orchard deployment should be guided not only by localization-aware accuracy but also by threshold robustness and the requirements of the downstream task.