# Cross-Cultural Value Attribution in Large Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09945 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09945/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17548/) (2023)
- [Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16388/) (2023)
- [Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.05783/) (2021)
- [Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10020/) (2022)
- [Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17466/) (2023)
- [Towards Measuring and Modeling "Culture" in LLMs: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15412/) (2024)
- [WorldValuesBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark Dataset for Multi-Cultural Value Awareness of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16308/) (2024)
- [Examining Gender and Racial Bias in Large Vision-Language Models Using a Novel Dataset of Parallel Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05779/) (2024)
- [SocialCounterfactuals: Probing and Mitigating Intersectional Social Biases in Vision-Language Models with Counterfactual Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00825/) (2023)
- [VisoGender: A dataset for benchmarking gender bias in image-text pronoun resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.12424/) (2023)
- [Culture is Not Trivia: Sociocultural Theory for Cultural NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12057/) (2025)
- [Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models at Scale with Counterfactuals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20152/) (2024)
- [LVLM-Compress-Bench: Benchmarking the Broader Impact of Large Vision-Language Model Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04982/) (2025)
- [Profiling Bias in LLMs: Stereotype Dimensions in Contextual Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16527/) (2024)
- [Cultural Counterfactuals: Evaluating Cultural Biases in Large Vision-Language Models with Counterfactual Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.02370/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid adoption of large vision-language models (LVLMs) in recent years has been accompanied by growing fairness concerns due to their propensity to reinforce harmful societal stereotypes. While significant attention has been paid to such fairness concerns in the context of social biases, relatively little prior work has examined the presence of stereotypes in LVLMs related to cultural contexts such as religion, nationality, and socioeconomic status. In this work, we aim to narrow this gap by investigating how LVLM judgments about a person's moral, ethical, and political values vary across cultural contexts presented in images. We conduct a multi-dimensional analysis of such value judgments in popular LVLMs using counterfactual image sets, which depict the same person across different cultural contexts. Our evaluation framework pairs descriptive analyses (Moral Foundations Theory categorization, lexical analyses, and value sensitivity) with a novel grounding analysis that compares LVLM cross-context variation against two large-scale human surveys (MFQ-2 and WVS Wave 7). Across 4.8 million LVLM generations, we identify three survey-grounding bias patterns that replicate across multiple architecturally diverse models. Additional ablations show that nationality grounding is text-dominant while religion and socioeconomic grounding depend strongly on the image, and that image conditioning can amplify survey-grounding bias patterns.