# Agentic Workflows for Resolving Conflict Over Shared Resources: A Power Grid Application

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09823 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09823/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [LeaseGuard: Incumbent-Preserving Admission Control for Privileged LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.24077/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing use of LLM-based agents to support decision-making and control across diverse domains motivates the need for systematic deconfliction of their proposed actions. We present a deconfliction framework for coordinating multiple agents that formally encapsulate individual applications, each proposing potentially conflicting actions over shared resources. Conflicts are resolved through three deconfliction modes: bilateral negotiation, structured mediation, and procedural (deterministic) deconfliction. We define design principles for large language model-based client agents, including a chain-of-thought style reasoning process, and introduce an iterative weighted-consensus mechanism that does not require the applications themselves to solve optimization problems. The framework is domain agnostic and supports both numeric and non-numeric decisions. Its performance is demonstrated on a power distribution use case with conflicting advanced distribution management system applications for cost optimization and resilience, coordinating diesel generators and battery energy storage systems.