# Do We Still Need GraphRAG? Benchmarking RAG and GraphRAG for Agentic Search Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09666 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09666/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)
- Retrieval-augmented generation / [Agentic RAG, agents and memory](https://mlsanity.com/rag/agentic-rag-agents-and-memory/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04906/) (2020)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.03551/) (2017)
- [Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09516/) (2025)
- [Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01060/) (2020)
- [When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10511/) (2022)
- [MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00573/) (2021)
- [RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.18059/) (2024)
- [Adaptive-RAG: Learning to Adapt Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models through Question Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14403/) (2024)
- [HippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14831/) (2024)
- [From RAG to Memory: Non-Parametric Continual Learning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14802/) (2025)
- [FlashRAG: A Modular Toolkit for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13576/) (2024)
- [PathRAG: Pruning Graph-based Retrieval Augmented Generation with Relational Paths](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14902/) (2025)
- [Graph-R1: Towards Agentic GraphRAG Framework via End-to-end Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21892/) (2025)
- [Hyper-RAG: Combating LLM Hallucinations using Hypergraph-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08758/) (2025)
- [Youtu-GraphRAG: Vertically Unified Agents for Graph Retrieval-Augmented Complex Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.19855/) (2025)
- [GraphSearch: Agentic Search-Augmented Reasoning for Zero-Shot Graph Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08621/) (2026)
- [ARise: Towards Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning via Risk-Adaptive Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10893/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [TRIAGE: Trustworthy Retrieval Instrumentation And Graph Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.03447/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and its graph-based extensions (GraphRAG) are effective paradigms for improving large language model (LLM) reasoning by grounding generation in external knowledge. However, most existing RAG and GraphRAG systems operate under static or one-shot retrieval, where a fixed set of documents is provided to the LLM in a single pass. In contrast, recent agentic search systems enable dynamic, multi-round retrieval and sequential decision-making during inference, and have shown strong gains when combined with vanilla RAG by introducing implicit structure through interaction. This progress raises a fundamental question: can agentic search compensate for the absence of explicit graph structure, reducing the need for costly GraphRAG pipelines? To answer this question, we introduce RAGSearch, a unified benchmark that evaluates dense RAG and representative GraphRAG methods as retrieval infrastructures under agentic search. RAGSearch covers both training-free and training-based agentic inference across multiple question answering benchmarks. To ensure fair and reproducible comparison, we standardize the LLM backbone, retrieval budgets, and inference protocols, and report results on full test sets. Beyond answer accuracy, we report offline preprocessing cost, online inference efficiency, and stability. Our results show that agentic search substantially improves dense RAG and narrows the performance gap to GraphRAG, particularly in RL-based settings. Nevertheless, GraphRAG remains advantageous for complex multi-hop reasoning, exhibiting more stable agentic search behavior when its offline cost is amortized. Together, these findings clarify the complementary roles of explicit graph structure and agentic search, and provide practical guidance on retrieval design for modern agentic RAG systems.