# SEA-Eval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Self-Evolving Agents Beyond Episodic Assessment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08988 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08988/

## Key facts

- Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 16 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)
- Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs / [Self-evolving LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/synth/self-evolving-llm-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00796/) (2016)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07864/) (2023)
- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07972/) (2024)
- [CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11738/) (2023)
- [Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16416/) (2025)
- [LifelongAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents as Lifelong Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11942/) (2025)
- [Memory for Autonomous LLM Agents:Mechanisms, Evaluation, and Emerging Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.07670/) (2026)
- [Building Self-Evolving Agents via Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning: A Framework and Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.19005/) (2025)
- [DARE: Diffusion Policy for Autonomous Robot Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16687/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Harness Updating Is Not Harness Benefit: Disentangling Evolution Capabilities in Self-Evolving LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30621/) (2026)
- [SEAGym: An Evaluation Environment for Self-Evolving LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.17546/) (2026)
- [EvoAgentBench: Benchmarking Agent Self-Evolution via Ability Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.05202/) (2026)
- [Evo-Bench: Can Language Models Improve Agent Harness?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09096/) (2026)
- [The Last AI Built by Humans: Toward Genuine Recursive Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.11873/) (2026)
- [Rethinking Self-Evolving Agent Skills: Feedback Dynamics over Multiple Rounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.02636/) (2026)
- [S3Gym: Can LLMs Turn Self-Testing and Self-Judging into Self-Improvement?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.31100/) (2026)
- [Beyond Final Scores: A Systematic Evaluation of Agents for Long-Horizon AI Research and Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.13417/) (2026)
- [FinEvo-Bench: A Longitudinal Benchmark for Self-Evolving Agents in Professional Financial Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.06144/) (2026)
- [Graph Engineering in the Era of LLM Agents: From Individual Intelligence to System Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.21156/) (2026)
- [GDPevo: Evaluating Agent Self-Evolution on Real Business Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.03764/) (2026)
- [Connect the Dots: Training LLMs for Long-Lifecycle Agents with Cross-Domain Generalization Via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20002/) (2026)
- [ScienceClaw: Benchmarking Continual Self-Evolution of AI-for-Science Agents Across the Natural and Social Sciences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08691/) (2026)
- [EmbodiedCLBench: Evaluating Continual Learning for Self-Evolving Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13021/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Current LLM-based agents demonstrate strong performance in episodic task execution but remain constrained by static toolsets and episodic amnesia, failing to accumulate experience across task boundaries. This paper formalizes the Self-Evolving Agent (SEA) from the perspective of digital embodiment and continuous cross-task evolution, introduces the Evolutionary Flywheel as its minimal sufficient architecture, and presents SEA-Eval -- the first benchmark designed specifically for evaluating SEAs. Grounded in Flywheel theory, SEA-Eval establishes SR and T as primary metrics and, through sequential task stream design, is designed to quantify evolutionary gain, evolutionary stability, and implicit alignment convergence. Empirical evaluation reveals that, under comparable success rates, token consumption differs by up to 31.2 times between frameworks on individual tasks, with divergent evolutionary trajectories emerging under sequential analysis -- demonstrating that success rate alone creates a capability illusion and that the sequential convergence of T is the key criterion for distinguishing genuine evolution from pseudo-evolution.