# EditCaption: Human-Refined SFT and HAE-DPO for Image Editing Instruction Synthesis

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08213 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08213/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 13 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Diffusion and multimodal model alignment](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/diffusion-and-multimodal-model-alignment/)
- Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs / [Self-improving MLLMs and synthetic data](https://mlsanity.com/synth/self-improving-mllms-and-synthetic-data/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09800/) (2022)
- [Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross Attention Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01626/) (2022)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12966/) (2023)
- [Imagic: Text-Based Real Image Editing with Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09276/) (2022)
- [MagicBrush: A Manually Annotated Dataset for Instruction-Guided Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10012/) (2023)
- [Step1X-Edit: A Practical Framework for General Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.17761/) (2025)
- [EditScore: Unlocking Online RL for Image Editing via High-Fidelity Reward Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23909/) (2025)
- [ByteMorph: Benchmarking Instruction-Guided Image Editing with Non-Rigid Motions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03107/) (2025)
- [Instruction-based Image Editing with Planning, Reasoning, and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.22624/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

High-quality source-target image pairs with precise editing instructions are essential for instruction-guided image editing, yet constructing such training triplets at scale remains costly. Recent pipelines often rely on vision-language models to synthesize editing instructions automatically, but we find that strong VLMs still struggle to describe visual transformations between image pairs. In particular, they exhibit three recurring failure modes: orientation inconsistency, viewpoint ambiguity, and missing fine-grained attributes. In a human evaluation on 400 image pairs, several open-source VLM baselines produce critical-error rates above 47%, making many synthesized instructions unsuitable for downstream training. To address this, we propose EditCaption, a two-stage post-training pipeline for image editing instruction synthesis. First, we construct a 100K supervised fine-tuning dataset through GLM-based auto-captioning, EditScore filtering, and human refinement. Second, we collect 10K human-annotated preference pairs, where each rejected instruction is labeled with its primary error type and severity. Based on this dataset, we propose Hardness-Adaptive Error-Aware DPO (HAE-DPO), a task-adapted DPO objective that introduces an adaptive margin based on human-labeled severity, failure-mode type, and reference-model hardness. Experiments across three benchmarks demonstrate that our 235B model with SFT+HAE-DPO achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source and closed models, scoring 4.720 on Eval-400, 4.672 on HQ-Edit, and 4.651 on ByteMorph-Bench -- surpassing Gemini-3-Pro on all three. Human evaluation confirms critical error rates drop from 47.75% to 17.50%, with correct rates improving from 41.75% to 70.25%, surpassing Gemini-3-Pro (66.00%).