# Rethinking Residual Errors in Compensation-based LLM Quantization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07955 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07955/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 28 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12877/) (2020)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11641/) (2019)
- [HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03771/) (2019)
- [BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10044/) (2019)
- [GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17323/) (2022)
- [Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05877/) (2017)
- [SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10438/) (2022)
- [LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07339/) (2022)
- [A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.13630/) (2021)
- [DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02954/) (2024)
- [QuaRot: Outlier-Free 4-Bit Inference in Rotated LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00456/) (2024)
- [A White Paper on Neural Network Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08295/) (2021)
- [SpinQuant: LLM quantization with learned rotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16406/) (2024)
- [OmniQuant: Omnidirectionally Calibrated Quantization for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.13137/) (2023)
- [QuIP#: Even Better LLM Quantization with Hadamard Incoherence and Lattice Codebooks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04396/) (2024)
- [Optimal Brain Compression: A Framework for Accurate Post-Training Quantization and Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.11580/) (2022)
- [RepQ-ViT: Scale Reparameterization for Post-Training Quantization of Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08254/) (2022)
- [RPTQ: Reorder-based Post-training Quantization for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01089/) (2023)
- [Towards Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Vision Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14341/) (2023)
- [GPTAQ: Efficient Finetuning-Free Quantization for Asymmetric Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02692/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [OffQ: Taming Structured Outliers in LLM Quantization by Offsetting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.07116/) (2026)
- [MARR: Module-Adaptive Residual Reconstruction for Low-Bit Post-Training Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17997/) (2026)
- [Cross-Layer Error Compensation and Finite-Sample Feature-Statistics Matching for Extreme Low-Bit Quantization of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.14630/) (2026)
- [SandwichQuant: Which Parameters Matter Before and After Quantization?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.24173/) (2026)
- [Scale Sensitivity in Low-Bit Post-Training Quantization: Curvature of the Quantization Error Landscape](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37416/) (2026)
- [FidelityQ: Preserving Predictive Fidelity in Ultra-Low-Bit Language Model Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14934/) (2026)
- [When Does Compensating Inherited Quantization Error Help? Mean-Square Guarantees for Layer-Wise Quantization and Their Limits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.16020/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Methods based on weight compensation, which iteratively apply quantization and weight compensation to minimize the output error, have recently demonstrated remarkable success in quantizing Large Language Models (LLMs). The representative work, GPTQ, introduces several key techniques that make such iterative methods practical for LLMs with billions of parameters. GPTAQ extends this approach by introducing an asymmetric calibration process that aligns the output of each quantized layer with its full-precision counterpart, incorporating a residual error into the weight compensation framework. In this work, we revisit the formulation of the residual error. We identify a sub-optimal calibration objective in existing methods: during the intra-layer calibration process, they align the quantized output with the output from compensated weights, rather than the true output from the original full-precision model. Therefore, we redefine the objective to precisely align the quantized model's output with the original output of the full-precision model at each step. We then reveal that the residual error originates not only from the output difference of the preceding layer but also from the discrepancy between the compensated and original weights within each layer, which we name the 'compensation-aware error'. By inheriting the neuron decomposition technique from GPTAQ, we can efficiently incorporate this compensation-aware error into the weight update process. Extensive experiments on various LLMs and quantization settings demonstrate that our proposed enhancements integrate seamlessly with both GPTQ and GPTAQ, significantly improving their quantization performance. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/list0830/ResComp.