# TEMPER: Testing Emotional Perturbation in Quantitative Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07801 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07801/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Audio-language model reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 24 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Audio-language model reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/audio-language-model-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6550/) (2014)
- [Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01644/) (2016)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04118/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00093/) (2023)
- [Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11324/) (2023)
- [MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13319/) (2019)
- [Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.04146/) (2017)
- [GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05229/) (2024)
- [GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00547/) (2020)
- [Solving General Arithmetic Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.01413/) (2016)
- [Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05335/) (2023)
- [A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15772/) (2021)
- [Dear Sir or Madam, May I introduce the GYAFC Dataset: Corpus, Benchmarks and Metrics for Formality Style Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06535/) (2018)
- [Deep Learning for Text Style Transfer: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00416/) (2020)
- [GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19255/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Understand and Can be Enhanced by Emotional Stimuli](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.11760/) (2023)
- [NegativePrompt: Leveraging Psychology for Large Language Models Enhancement via Negative Emotional Stimuli](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02814/) (2024)
- [Emotions Where Art Thou: Understanding and Characterizing the Emotional Latent Space of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.22042/) (2025)
- [Emotional RAG LLMs: Reading Comprehension for the Open Internet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11189/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Latent-IM: Latent Interaction Management for Speech LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26928/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models are trained and evaluated on quantitative reasoning tasks written in clean, emotionally neutral language. However, real-world queries are often wrapped in frustration, urgency or enthusiasm. Does emotional framing alone degrade reasoning when all numerical content is preserved? To investigate this, a controlled emotion translation framework is developed that rewrites problems into emotional variants while preserving all quantities and relationships. Using this framework, Temper-5400 (5,400 semantically verified emotion-neutral pairs) is constructed across GSM8K, MultiArith, and ARC-Challenge, and evaluated on eighteen models (1B to frontier scale). Two core results emerge: First, emotional framing reduces accuracy by 2-10 percentage points even though all numerical content is preserved. Second, neutralizing emotional variants recovers most of the lost performance, showing both that the degradation is tied to emotional style rather than content corruption and that neutralization can serve as a lightweight inference-time mitigation. Non-emotional paraphrases cause no such degradation, implicating emotional content rather than surface-level changes. Beyond emotion specifically, the benchmark construction procedure offers a controllable instrument for stylistic translation and robustness evaluation.