# Implicit Regularization and Generalization in Overparameterized Neural Networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07603 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07603/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07572/) (2018)
- [The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03635/) (2018)
- [Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.03530/) (2016)
- [On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minima](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.04836/) (2016)
- [Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.09913/) (2017)
- [Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-off](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.11118/) (2018)
- [A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03962/) (2018)
- [Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurt](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02292/) (2019)
- [Exploring Generalization in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.08947/) (2017)
- [Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04933/) (2017)
- [Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13655/) (2019)
- [Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleys](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.01838/) (2016)
- [To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01396/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Classical statistical learning theory predicts that overparameterized models should exhibit severe overfitting, yet modern deep neural networks with far more parameters than training samples consistently generalize well. This contradiction has become a central theoretical question in machine learning. This study investigates the role of optimization dynamics and implicit regularization in enabling generalization in overparameterized neural networks through controlled experiments. We examine stochastic gradient descent (SGD) across batch sizes, the geometry of flat versus sharp minima via Hessian eigenvalue estimation and weight perturbation analysis, the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) regime through wide-network experiments, double descent across model scales, and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis through iterative magnitude pruning. All experiments use PyTorch on CIFAR-10 and MNIST with multiple random seeds. Our findings demonstrate that generalization is strongly influenced by the interaction between network architecture, optimization algorithms, and loss landscape geometry. Smaller batch sizes consistently produced lower test error and flatter minima, with an 11.8x difference in top Hessian eigenvalue between small-batch and large-batch solutions corresponding to 1.61 percentage points higher test accuracy. Sparse subnetworks retaining only 10% of parameters achieved within 1.15 percentage points of full model performance when retrained from their original initialization. These results highlight the need for revised learning-theoretic frameworks capable of explaining generalization in high-dimensional model regimes.