# ReflectRM: Boosting Generative Reward Models via Self-Reflection within a Unified Judgment Framework

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07506 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07506/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 25 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Reward modeling and RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/reward-modeling-and-rlhf/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15240/) (2024)
- [Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12845/) (2024)
- [Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17746/) (2025)
- [Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18451/) (2024)
- [JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12784/) (2024)
- [Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02495/) (2025)
- [Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01352/) (2025)
- [Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19594/) (2024)
- [RM-Bench: Benchmarking Reward Models of Language Models with Subtlety and Style](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16184/) (2024)
- [Seed1.5-Thinking: Advancing Superb Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13914/) (2025)
- [General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14652/) (2025)
- [How to Evaluate Reward Models for RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14872/) (2024)
- [JudgeLRM: Large Reasoning Models as a Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00050/) (2025)
- [HelpSteer3-Preference: Open Human-Annotated Preference Data across Diverse Tasks and Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11475/) (2025)
- [CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03686/) (2025)
- [Improve LLM-as-a-Judge Ability as a General Ability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11689/) (2025)
- [SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16705/) (2024)
- [TasTe: Teaching Large Language Models to Translate through Self-Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08434/) (2024)
- [GRAM: A Generative Foundation Reward Model for Reward Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14175/) (2025)
- [Self-Reflection Makes Large Language Models Safer, Less Biased, and Ideologically Neutral](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10400/) (2024)
- [Think Twice, Generate Once: Safeguarding by Progressive Self-Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01270/) (2025)
- [GRAM-R2: Self-Training Generative Foundation Reward Models for Reward Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02492/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [F2DR: A Fine-Grained Full-Pipeline Reward Framework for DeepSearch Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19827/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reward Models (RMs) are critical components in the Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) pipeline, directly determining the alignment quality of Large Language Models (LLMs). Recently, Generative Reward Models (GRMs) have emerged as a superior paradigm, offering higher interpretability and stronger generalization than traditional scalar RMs. However, existing methods for GRMs focus primarily on outcome-level supervision, neglecting analytical process quality, which constrains their potential. To address this, we propose ReflectRM, a novel GRM that leverages self-reflection to assess analytical quality and enhance preference modeling. ReflectRM is trained under a unified generative framework for joint modeling of response preference and analysis preference. During inference, we use its self-reflection capability to identify the most reliable analysis, from which the final preference prediction is derived. Experiments across four benchmarks show that ReflectRM consistently improves performance, achieving an average accuracy gain of +3.7 on Qwen3-4B. Further experiments confirm that response preference and analysis preference are mutually reinforcing. Notably, ReflectRM substantially mitigates positional bias, yielding +10.2 improvement compared with leading GRMs and establishing itself as a more stable evaluator. Our code is available at https://github.com/yuliangCarmelo/ReflectRM.