# An RTK-SLAM Dataset for Absolute Accuracy Evaluation in GNSS-Degraded Environments

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07151 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07151/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [VINS-Mono: A Robust and Versatile Monocular Visual-Inertial State Estimator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.03852/) (2017)
- [FAST-LIO2: Fast Direct LiDAR-inertial Odometry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06829/) (2021)
- [Are We Ready for Service Robots? The OpenLORIS-Scene Datasets for Lifelong SLAM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05603/) (2019)
- [OKVIS2: Realtime Scalable Visual-Inertial SLAM with Loop Closure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.09199/) (2022)
- [Hilti-Oxford Dataset: A Millimetre-Accurate Benchmark for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09825/) (2022)
- [FusionPortableV2: A Unified Multi-Sensor Dataset for Generalized SLAM Across Diverse Platforms and Scalable Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08563/) (2024)
- [Ground-Fusion: A Low-cost Ground SLAM System Robust to Corner Cases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14308/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [UpDown-SC: Gravity-Canonicalized Dual-Envelope Scan Context for Indoor LiDAR Place Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29118/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

RTK-SLAM systems integrate simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) with real-time kinematic (RTK) GNSS positioning, promising both relative consistency and globally referenced coordinates for efficient georeferenced surveying. A critical and underappreciated issue is that the standard evaluation metric, Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE), first fits an optimal rigid-body transformation between the estimated trajectory and reference before computing errors. This so-called SE(3) alignment absorbs global drift and systematic errors, making trajectories appear more accurate than they are in practice, and is unsuitable for evaluating the global accuracy of RTK-SLAM. We present a geodetically referenced dataset and evaluation methodology that expose this gap. A key design principle is that the RTK receiver is used solely as a system input, while ground truth is established independently via a geodetic total station. This separation is absent from all existing datasets, where GNSS typically serves as (part of) the ground truth. The dataset is collected with a handheld RTK-SLAM device, comprising two scenes. We evaluate LiDAR-inertial, visual-inertial, and LiDAR-visual-inertial RTK-SLAM systems alongside standalone RTK, reporting direct global accuracy and SE(3)-aligned relative accuracy to make the gap explicit. Results show that SE(3) alignment can underestimate absolute positioning error by up to 76%. RTK-SLAM achieves centimeter-level absolute accuracy in open-sky conditions and maintains decimeter-level global accuracy indoors, where standalone RTK degrades to tens of meters. The dataset, calibration files, and evaluation scripts are publicly available at https://rtk-slam-dataset.github.io/.
